Bug 356530 - Keyboard shortcuts should be searchable across components
Summary: Keyboard shortcuts should be searchable across components
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 250121
Alias: None
Product: systemsettings
Classification: Applications
Component: kcm_khotkeys (show other bugs)
Version: 5.4.3
Platform: Fedora RPMs Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Jansen
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-12-11 21:03 UTC by Sudhir Khanger
Modified: 2020-01-12 05:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sudhir Khanger 2015-12-11 21:03:05 UTC
If you want to find out what keyboard shortcut Meta+0 does then you have to first choose appropriate kde component. You have to select and search through a lot of component to find out the one that could contain the keyboard shortcut that you are looking for. Keyboard shortcut should be searchable across components.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. System Settings > Shortcuts > Global Keyboard Shortcut.
2. Select a component and search.
3. Repeat 2 until you figure out the right component.

Actual Results:  
A keyboard should is only searchable in its own component.

Expected Results:  
Keyboard shortcuts should be searchable across components
Comment 1 Till Schäfer 2015-12-22 14:33:14 UTC
this is also a problem i am facing regular. 

i would suggest an approach, that is orientated towards filters on components. I.e. one could select all components, a subset of them or just a single one.
Comment 2 D. Debnath 2020-01-11 19:09:56 UTC
I'm surprised that this has been reported in 2015 and it hasn't been addressed yet. This is a no brainer.
Comment 3 leftcrane 2020-01-12 02:29:02 UTC
Please no user customized "filters" on components. Just search everything and organize the search results by component, visually. There is no need for the user to "filter" anything, only to select the appropriate search result. Just make it simple.
Comment 4 Nate Graham 2020-01-12 05:18:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 250121 ***