Noticed while reviewing the openSUSE package update. Commits ed811598 and 4a52e703 add soversions for the kbibtexpart module. This part of these commits shall be reverted. Modules don't need (and never have) symlinks.
Git commit cedcb72a6d56ea214e3f5a6c7f4f231a023e474e by Thomas Fischer. Committed on 18/08/2015 at 20:40. Pushed by thomasfischer into branch 'kbibtex/0.6'. Removing soversion from KBibTeX Part As noticed by Christophe Giboudeaux when reviewing packages for openSUSE, KBibTeX had soversions for its KPart modules. This is not seen for other KParts and therefore version numbers get removed from KBibTeX's KPart. M +0 -9 src/parts/CMakeLists.txt http://commits.kde.org/kbibtex/cedcb72a6d56ea214e3f5a6c7f4f231a023e474e
Git commit fb0518d477cd0836945fb94c903b6dcab017bb17 by Thomas Fischer. Committed on 18/08/2015 at 20:42. Pushed by thomasfischer into branch 'kbibtex/0.7'. Removing soversion from KBibTeX Part As noticed by Christophe Giboudeaux when reviewing packages for openSUSE, KBibTeX had soversions for its KPart modules. This is not seen for other KParts and therefore version numbers get removed from KBibTeX's KPart. M +0 -9 src/parts/CMakeLists.txt http://commits.kde.org/kbibtex/fb0518d477cd0836945fb94c903b6dcab017bb17
Git commit ec0c94ff5d963be7d4beefe0f3ae414fc8f729b3 by Thomas Fischer. Committed on 18/08/2015 at 20:44. Pushed by thomasfischer into branch 'master'. Removing soversion from KBibTeX Part As noticed by Christophe Giboudeaux when reviewing packages for openSUSE, KBibTeX had soversions for its KPart modules. This is not seen for other KParts and therefore version numbers get removed from KBibTeX's KPart. Manual forward-port of commit fb0518d. M +0 -9 src/parts/CMakeLists.txt http://commits.kde.org/kbibtex/ec0c94ff5d963be7d4beefe0f3ae414fc8f729b3
I made changes to all relevant branches. Please check and confirm that those commits solve the probem. Do you deem this issue sufficiently severe that a 0.6.1 release is necessary?
(In reply to Thomas Fischer from comment #4) > I made changes to all relevant branches. Please check and confirm that those > commits solve the probem. > > Do you deem this issue sufficiently severe that a 0.6.1 release is necessary? It's up to you :) Notifying release-team@ may be enough with the patch attached is probably enough for now.
(In reply to Christophe Giboudeaux from comment #5) > It's up to you :) Notifying release-team@ may be enough with the patch > attached is probably enough for now. KBibTeX being ExtraGear is independent from official KDE releases. I am planning a bugfix release for 0.6 'really soon' (TM), which should resolve this matter.