Bug 341338 - I have to ask twice to get my mail checked
Summary: I have to ask twice to get my mail checked
Status: RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED
Alias: None
Product: Akonadi
Classification: Frameworks and Libraries
Component: IMAP resource (show other bugs)
Version: 1.13.0
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christian Mollekopf
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-11-27 22:34 UTC by Grósz Dániel
Modified: 2017-01-07 22:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Grósz Dániel 2014-11-27 22:34:08 UTC 
Lately I often have to ask KMail twice to get my mail checked. (Not sure if KMail or Akonadi bug.)
First time I click on the Check mail button, in the bottom right corner progress bars appear for each of my accounts; they show 100% each, then disappear after a second without actually getting my new mail.

If I click a second time, it usually actually checks all my folders (seen at the progress bars), and gets my new mail.

Reproducible: Sometimes




Might be related to various other problems reported here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327513#c6
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2014-11-27 23:22:05 UTC 
Are these all IMAP or POP accounts, or both, or which types?
Comment 2 Grósz Dániel 2014-11-27 23:33:18 UTC 
IMAP all.

(Btw sorry if this is a duplicate, I couldn't think up good search terms for it.)
Comment 3 Denis Kurz 2016-09-24 20:42:28 UTC 
This bug has only been reported for versions older than KDEPIM 4.14 (at most akonadi-1.3). Can anyone tell if this bug still present?

If noone confirms this bug for a recent version of akonadi (part of KDE Applications 15.08 or later), it gets closed in about three months.
Comment 4 Denis Kurz 2017-01-07 22:38:27 UTC 
Just as announced in my last comment, I close this bug. If you encounter it again in a recent version (at least 5.0 aka 15.08), please open a new one unless it already exists. Thank you for all your input.