Bug 336118 - [project website] images kile_big.png and kile.png are broken
Summary: [project website] images kile_big.png and kile.png are broken
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kile
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 2.1.3
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Ludwig
URL: http://kile.sourceforge.net/
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-06-12 10:31 UTC by Martin Walch
Modified: 2017-01-03 18:52 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
http://kile.sourceforge.net/images/kile.png (1.91 KB, image/png)
2016-11-17 21:30 UTC, Martin Walch 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Walch 2014-06-12 10:31:08 UTC 
These two images seem to be broken:

http://kile.sourceforge.net/images/kile_big.png
http://kile.sourceforge.net/images/kile.png

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Michel Ludwig 2016-11-17 10:41:34 UTC 
I cannot reproduce the problem - maybe it was a temporary problem of the hoster.
Comment 2 Martin Walch 2016-11-17 21:30:40 UTC 
Created attachment 102284 [details]
http://kile.sourceforge.net/images/kile.png

Sorry, still broken for me. This is the file that I get as kile.png. When trying to view it in gwenview stderr says

libpng error: IDAT: invalid distance too far back
Comment 3 Christoph Feck 2016-11-18 02:17:24 UTC 
Firefox displays the image fine, but anything based on libpng does not.
Comment 4 Michel Ludwig 2016-11-19 07:32:14 UTC 
Images have been recreated and they seem to be displayed fine in gwenview and Konqueror now,
Comment 5 Martin Walch 2017-01-03 13:25:45 UTC 
Sorry for the noise, but I just came across the kile wiki which also uses the file as main logo.

http://kile.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
http://kile.sourceforge.net/wiki/images/kile_big.png

Registering as a new user in the Kile wiki currently does not seem to work properly. (Otherwise I would have tried updating the file myself.)
Comment 6 Michel Ludwig 2017-01-03 18:52:05 UTC 
That file has also been updated - thanks for reporting!