I'm looking at the data from H and found the lines from alpha (656nm) and the beta (486nm) but than there are a lot of lines missing: (table from: http://www.chemgapedia.de/vsengine/vlu/vsc/de/ch/13/vlu/analytik/aas/atombau.vlu/Page/vsc/de/ch/13/pc/analytik/aas/aas4_am11.vscml.html) m Bezeichnung Wellenlänge in nm 3 H α 656,47 4 H β 486,27 5 H γ 434,17 6 H δ 410,29 7 H ε 397,12 8 H ζ 389,02 9 H η 383,65 10 H θ 379,90 11 H ι 377,17 12 H κ 375,13 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open kalzium 2. click on H 3. choose "spectrum" and compare table to the one I copied under "details" of this report Actual Results: The Lines between 121nm and 486nm are missing. Expected Results: The Lines should be there. Because of the reliability loss from this bug to kalzium I put severity to "Major".
I was also wondering if all the lines should be included and which sources can be used. E.g. this[1] is one of the sources used by WolframAlpha, and for some atoms (I've only checked Alkali atoms which is what I am working with) it provides two order of magnitude more lines and also a lot more informations about each lines. [1] http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html
Hello Currently Kalzium uses the blue obelisk repository. http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/blueobelisk/index.php?title=DataRepository I have just seen they made an update of the repository:-) So I goint go merge upstream into Kalzium (elements.xml and isotopes.xml). Unfortunately I didn't find the new spectrum.xml file. Altoght I don't think your requested lines will be already in the blue obelisk repository. It would be nice to have them upstream. Maybe somone could try to get it there? Regards Etienne
Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved.