Printing http://www.civati.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Mozione-Civati-Dalla-delusione-alla-speranza.pdf with settings: - odd pages; - reverse page order will result the printer will print only from page 7 to 1, how is it possible in a 70 pages document? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: . Actual Results: . Expected Results: .
Downstream bugreport: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031396
What does print preview show? What happens if you run pdftops on the file and then send the resulting ps to your printer via lpr?
If you can provide the information requested in comment #2, please add it.
(In reply to comment #2) > What does print preview show? 8th page is empty in print preview > What happens if you run pdftops on the file and then send the resulting ps > to your printer via lpr? Instead of printing 70 pages on a single side, can I do a trick like this one? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031203#c5 ( cupsctl PreserveJobFiles=Yes ) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031203#c5 cupsctl PreserveJobFiles=Yes
This is an upstream bug in poppler, it is generating wrong .ps when converting this file to postscript. You can see that by doing pdftops myfile.pdf gs myfile.ps press enter a few times to change page. You'll end up with something like Error: /rangecheck in --xyshow-- Operand stack: 309.24 301.1 (\003R\003R) --nostringval-- (\003R\003R) --nostringval-- Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1916 1 3 %oparray_pop 1915 1 3 %oparray_pop 1899 1 3 %oparray_pop 1787 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- Dictionary stack: --dict:1171/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:78/200(L)-- --dict:70/75(L)-- --dict:19/25(L)-- --dict:11/15(L)-- Please open a bug for poppler in https://bugs.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72184 Nobody still paid attention to it.