Well, I'm might be pedantic (file transfer itself works fine for file w/ bytes in it) but nevertheless ... Reproducible: Always
Well, is there any good reason so send 0 byte files? I would just consider it as spam, therefor the failed is intented. If you have a VERY good reason for sending 0byte files, feel free to reopen the bug.
(In reply to comment #1) > Well, is there any good reason so send 0 byte files? > I would just consider it as spam, therefor the failed is intented. > > If you have a VERY good reason for sending 0byte files, feel free to reopen > the bug. Probbaly you're right- otoh it could be only the file *name* which could be interesting enough. Maybe either b/c it contains character/s which lets act software in an somehow interesting behaviour or b/c of (ok, much more obscure reason) steganographic goals. Well - not strong enough, or ?