amarok links against qtwebkit but cmake doesn't actually check for it during configuration state, so the cmake summary says everything is fine and then build fails because headers are not found.
Hasn't QtWebKit been an implicit dependency of Qt? I'm asking because noone has complained before.
You can compile without qtwebkit. More to the point though on a distribution package level you mostly everywhere can install qtcore/gui without dragging in qtwebkit because there is no dependency there.
Git commit 8553ca7203718eb90ccfeeb8a79d9d33abe27c35 by Mark Kretschmann.
Committed on 28/06/2013 at 07:46.
Pushed by markey into branch 'master'.
Add missing CMake check for QtWebKit.
I've also added checks for all the other Qt library components
we depend on. Please check if I have forgotten any.
M +3 -3 CMakeLists.txt
M +1 -0 ChangeLog