Bug 321249 - <caption>s don't appear when <mediaobjectco> is used
Summary: <caption>s don't appear when <mediaobjectco> is used
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: docs.kde.org
Classification: Websites
Component: ksgmltools (show other bugs)
Version: 4.10
Platform: Fedora RPMs Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Documentation Editorial Team
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-06-17 02:34 UTC by T.C. Hollingsworth
Modified: 2018-11-10 10:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
patch to apply to branches/work/doc/fundamentals to reproduce the issue (1.02 KB, patch)
2013-06-17 02:36 UTC, T.C. Hollingsworth 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description T.C. Hollingsworth 2013-06-17 02:34:17 UTC 
When <mediaobjectco> is used instead of <mediaobject> (so imagemaps can be used) and the <caption> tag is correctly nested within it (instead of within <screenshot> like the draft presently does erroneously), the <caption> text does not appear.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
svn export svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/work/doc/fundamentals/
cd fundamentals
patch -p0 -i <attached patch file>
meinproc4 index.docbook
konqueror ui.html
Actual Results:  
<caption> text does not appear

Expected Results:  
<caption> text appears below image
Comment 1 T.C. Hollingsworth 2013-06-17 02:36:59 UTC 
Created attachment 80571 [details]
patch to apply to branches/work/doc/fundamentals to reproduce the issue
Comment 2 Andrew Crouthamel 2018-11-10 03:12:59 UTC 
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been stagnant for a long time. Could you help us out and re-test if the bug is valid in the latest version? I am setting the status to NEEDSINFO pending your response, please change the Status back to REPORTED when you respond.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 3 Luigi Toscano 2018-11-10 10:49:57 UTC 
I thought that there was consensus on closing old bugs in NEEDINFO state. I don't automatically agree on automatically moving old bugs in NEEDINFO.