Bug 319892 - cannot delete selected files in album view
Summary: cannot delete selected files in album view
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Albums-Trash (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-05-16 04:28 UTC by Axel Krebs
Modified: 2017-08-14 08:35 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 5.1.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Axel Krebs 2013-05-16 04:28:40 UTC
If right-clicking on a file in album view, one can delete files usually just by clicking "delete"

In this case, the delete-function does not work anymore.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. open album view
2. selects one or more pics
3. try to delete these pics
4. there occurs a long waiting period, but nothing happens
Comment 1 Axel Krebs 2013-05-18 03:08:59 UTC
observing many times this strange behavior, I must notice, that sometimes deleting pics works just fine. 

It appers like digiKam waits for something, and, if this (unknown) condition ist fulfilled, it just works. 

Maybe there is something blocked? 

Access to KDE processes? 

Hope you'll find this annoying cause.


Axel
Comment 2 Juwe 2013-05-26 13:44:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
Observing the same behavior on Ubuntu 13.04 Digikam 3.1.0
During delete of album or file Digikam is blocked for 40sec and 0 % CPU. After this time album or files are deleted.

Juwe
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2013-05-26 16:45:24 UTC
Not reproducible here. I play everyday with digiKam...

Mageia 3, KDE 4.11

Gilles Caulier
Comment 4 Axel Krebs 2013-06-01 07:44:01 UTC
My personel view on this issue: if _two_ people notice there is something potentially going wrong, there must be a real cause.

Therefore, status should be "confirmed" rather then neglecting and saying "unconfirmed". Or?

May I suggest to develop a testing szenario or test procedure. How could this be alike?

Maybe we can exclude some drawbacks and misleading reasons.


Axel
Comment 5 caulier.gilles 2013-11-26 17:03:18 UTC
This entry still valid with digiKam 3.5.0 ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 6 caulier.gilles 2014-08-31 22:16:27 UTC
Axel,

This file still valid using last digiKam 4.2.0 ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 7 caulier.gilles 2015-06-28 09:42:19 UTC
New digiKam 4.11.0 is available :

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 8 caulier.gilles 2015-08-20 06:48:52 UTC
digiKam 4.12.0 is out :

https://www.digikam.org/node/741

We need a fresh feedback using this release please...
Thanks in advance.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 9 caulier.gilles 2016-07-14 16:57:23 UTC
With digiKam 5.0.0  this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier