Bug 319283 - Differentiate "not rated" from "zero stars"
Summary: Differentiate "not rated" from "zero stars"
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tags-Rating (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Ubuntu Packages Linux
: NOR wishlist with 20 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-05-03 16:01 UTC by Anguo
Modified: 2022-01-22 10:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.6.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anguo 2013-05-03 16:01:34 UTC
I want to award the very worst pictures "zero stars".  It may be a cultural thing, but for me, "five star" means the very best, "one star" means the picture is quite bad but still has some redeemable value.  

Reproducible: Always

Actual Results:  
Currently, there are 6 rating levels:
- unrated.
- 5 stars.
- 4 stars.
- 3 stars.
- 2 stars.
- 1 star.

Expected Results:  
Ideally, there would be 7 rating levels:
- unrated.
- 5 stars.
- 4 stars.
- 3 stars.
- 2 stars.
- 1 star.
- 0 stars.
Comment 1 Anguo 2013-05-03 16:04:25 UTC
In the current set up, unrated == 0 stars, which means we cannot differentiate one from the other.
I'd like to go over the whole collection and filter to see only unrated pictures so that I can rate them. This way, I can make sure that every single picture in my collection is properly rated on a 0 to 5 scale.
Comment 2 caulier.gilles 2014-07-18 08:10:31 UTC
0 start and not rated has the same signification in digiKam and there is no plan to separate these properties. 

Gilles Caulier