I suggest to add a button(?), which can be pressed intentionally- on demand, if necessary. The function behind should be a pic-by-pic comparison showing differences between two pics visually. This is a logical "minus", running automatically, on demand. Therefore, I hope to get an ability to speed up the visual pairwise comparison and, therefore, the overall scanning of large numbers of pic collections. Fotographere often takes variants of pictures (=narrow down a theme), and, in this case, this ability would help enormously. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. start digiKam 2. open Light Table 3. You'll miss the suggested feature completely Actual Results: not existing feature :-( Expected Results: please see above! >> Selectable option to automated pairwise comparison!!
Never got a confirmation on this WISH Am 01.05.2013 12:56, schrieb Axel Krebs: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319160 > > Bug ID: 319160 > Summary: Extend Light Table Capabilities > Classification: Unclassified > Product: digikam > Version: 3.1.0 > Platform: Ubuntu Packages > OS: Linux > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: wishlist > Priority: NOR > Component: Light Table > Assignee: digikam-devel@kde.org > Reporter: axel.krebs@t-online.de > > I suggest to add a button(?), which can be pressed intentionally- on demand, if > necessary. > > The function behind should be a pic-by-pic comparison showing differences > between two pics visually. This is a logical "minus", running automatically, on > demand. > > Therefore, I hope to get an ability to speed up the visual pairwise comparison > and, therefore, the overall scanning of large numbers of pic collections. > > Fotographere often takes variants of pictures (=narrow down a theme), and, in > this case, this ability would help enormously. > > Reproducible: Always > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. start digiKam > 2. open Light Table > 3. You'll miss the suggested feature completely > Actual Results: > not existing feature :-( > > Expected Results: > please see above! > >>> Selectable option to automated pairwise comparison!! >
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 314022 ***