Bug 316928 - Servicing: statut of each servicing option should be searchable
Summary: Servicing: statut of each servicing option should be searchable
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: ProgressManager-Batch (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other Linux
: NOR major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-17 18:48 UTC by Axel Krebs
Modified: 2022-02-05 15:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.0.0
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Axel Krebs 2013-03-17 18:48:51 UTC
When servicing a large pics collection, running alle servicing roptions takes time  and time (in my case several days). 

Reffering on single pics, users are _not_ able to see "from outside" the status of each pic, concerning availability, preview (thumbnails), face-recognition status and so on.  


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. it is an implicite issues, no error 
2.
3.


Expected Results:  
I suggest strongly: mark every servicing option for very pic.

Given this situation, digiKam would be able to decide if a pic contains already that treatment (as building a thumbnail, or face recognition, e.g.).

Key topic should be, to run every time-consuming option once per pic. 

Therefore, digiKam needs to "decide" which pic need a time-consuming treatment or not. 

Besides, this could affect/support an incorporating-of-a-database-on-demand- feature. Thereby, I mean, that all the data produced in servicing progress, would be available instanteously when incorporating a database (path containing a pic collection) or get switched off in the contradictous situation.

This is not an error or failure rather than a fundamentel limitation. For this reason, I consider this as a "major fault"
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2013-07-28 08:19:09 UTC
Sorry, i don't understand this entry. Can you give some user case with a simple descriptive notice. Screenshot will help to understand your report

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 caulier.gilles 2015-06-25 13:14:15 UTC
New digiKam 4.11.0 is available with official PKG installer for OSX.

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2015-08-20 06:48:45 UTC
digiKam 4.12.0 is out :

https://www.digikam.org/node/741

We need a fresh feedback using this release please...
Thanks in advance.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2016-07-15 18:46:08 UTC
no response....
Comment 5 caulier.gilles 2019-12-29 04:52:09 UTC
Not reproducible with 7.0.0 beta 1.