Bug 316161 - Reuse face tags from another picture
Summary: Reuse face tags from another picture
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Faces-Workflow (show other bugs)
Version: 2.8.0
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-05 11:57 UTC by Johannes Vogel
Modified: 2019-12-23 15:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.0.0
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
Screenshot of digikam with an usual example (579.64 KB, image/png)
2013-03-05 11:57 UTC, Johannes Vogel
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Johannes Vogel 2013-03-05 11:57:49 UTC
Created attachment 77766 [details]
Screenshot of digikam with an usual example

Normally we shoot three or more pics when we make group photos. The most of them the people stand at the same position. If you need to add a tag for each person on the picture it needs a lot of time.

Maybe it would be very easy to copy the regions with the tags from another picture, when I click first on the "add a face tag" button and then the picture in the thumbnail bar, from which I take the face tags. After this action maybe I have to change the position of the face tags, but this is much easier than creating new face tags.
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2013-03-05 12:03:40 UTC
This is the goal of Face Recognition (not face detection) which is under development.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 caulier.gilles 2013-03-05 12:04:41 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 271679 ***
Comment 3 Johannes Vogel 2013-03-05 12:14:22 UTC
Maybe I don't trust 'automatically' recognized face mechanism and I'd like to do the job manually. I think my way is very easy to develop and to use. Much easier, I think, than automatic face recognation...
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2014-08-24 09:35:47 UTC
This is the goal a feces recognition mechanism... Please try last digiKam 4.2.0 where this feature become really suitable.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 5 caulier.gilles 2019-12-23 15:30:46 UTC
Not reproducible using 7.0.0-beta1