Application: akonadi_mixedmaildir_resource (4.9) KDE Platform Version: 4.9.3 Qt Version: 4.8.3 Operating System: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10 -- Information about the crash: - What I was doing when the application crashed: I opened Kmail and got on with other work. A few minutes later a related system generated this crash report. I have seen the same report before during normal kmail usage, but would classs the crash as intermittent. The crash can be reproduced some of the time. -- Backtrace: Application: KMail Folders of type KMail Mail Folder (akonadi_mixedmaildir_resource), signal: Bus error Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [KCrash Handler] #6 _wordcopy_fwd_dest_aligned (dstp=<optimized out>, srcp=<optimized out>, len=346252) at wordcopy.c:205 #7 0x00007f920c4a0aac in __memmove_sse2 (dest=0x7f91fd373cb8, src=<optimized out>, len=2773755) at ../string/memmove.c:76 #8 0x00007f920f0d9538 in memmove (__len=2773755, __src=<optimized out>, __dest=0x7f91fd373cb8) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:58 #9 KMBox::MBox::purge (this=0x2021628, deletedEntries=..., movedEntries=0x7fffa55e4d50) at ../../kmbox/mbox.cpp:386 #10 0x0000000000434190 in purge (movedEntries=..., this=0x2021610) at ../../../resources/mixedmaildir/mixedmaildirstore.cpp:174 #11 MixedMaildirStore::Private::visit (this=0x1fbf4d0, job=0x1ff58a0) at ../../../resources/mixedmaildir/mixedmaildirstore.cpp:2196 #12 0x0000000000420ff9 in MixedMaildirStore::processJob (this=<optimized out>, job=0x1ff58a0) at ../../../resources/mixedmaildir/mixedmaildirstore.cpp:2287 #13 0x00007f921009f340 in Akonadi::FileStore::AbstractLocalStore::Private::processJobs (this=0x1ff4c00, jobs=...) at ../../../../resources/shared/filestore/abstractlocalstore.cpp:295 #14 0x00007f920ce7af5f in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0x1fb0a00, m=<optimized out>, local_signal_index=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fffa55e51c0) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3547 #15 0x00007f92100a4182 in Akonadi::FileStore::AbstractJobSession::jobsReady (this=<optimized out>, _t1=...) at ./session_p.moc:99 #16 0x00007f92100a47ef in runNextJob (this=<optimized out>) at ../../../../resources/shared/filestore/sessionimpls.cpp:142 #17 qt_static_metacall (_id=<optimized out>, _o=<optimized out>, _c=<optimized out>, _a=<optimized out>) at ./sessionimpls_p.moc:50 #18 Akonadi::FileStore::FiFoQueueJobSession::qt_static_metacall (_o=0x7f91fd374b48, _c=4248276968, _id=346252, _a=0x18) at ./sessionimpls_p.moc:44 #19 0x00007f920ce7af5f in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0x1fb0620, m=<optimized out>, local_signal_index=<optimized out>, argv=0x0) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3547 #20 0x00007f920ce7a26c in QObject::event (this=0x1fb0620, e=<optimized out>) at kernel/qobject.cpp:1157 #21 0x00007f920d847e9c in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=this@entry=0x1dd6530, receiver=receiver@entry=0x1fb0620, e=e@entry=0x7fffa55e5980) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4562 #22 0x00007f920d84c30a in QApplication::notify (this=0x7fffa55e5c70, receiver=0x1fb0620, e=0x7fffa55e5980) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4423 #23 0x00007f920e5501d6 in KApplication::notify (this=0x7fffa55e5c70, receiver=0x1fb0620, event=0x7fffa55e5980) at ../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:311 #24 0x00007f920ce6556e in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0x7fffa55e5c70, receiver=0x1fb0620, event=0x7fffa55e5980) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:915 #25 0x00007f920ce96462 in sendEvent (event=0x7fffa55e5980, receiver=<optimized out>) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:231 #26 QTimerInfoList::activateTimers (this=0x1dda460) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:611 #27 0x00007f920ce93584 in timerSourceDispatch (source=<optimized out>) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:186 #28 timerSourceDispatch (source=<optimized out>) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:180 #29 0x00007f920881bab5 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #30 0x00007f920881bde8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #31 0x00007f920881bea4 in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #32 0x00007f920ce93bf6 in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0x1dacbe0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:424 #33 0x00007f920d8ecc1e in QGuiEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=<optimized out>, flags=...) at kernel/qguieventdispatcher_glib.cpp:204 #34 0x00007f920ce642bf in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=this@entry=0x7fffa55e5bf0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #35 0x00007f920ce64548 in QEventLoop::exec (this=0x7fffa55e5bf0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:204 #36 0x00007f920ce69708 in QCoreApplication::exec () at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1187 #37 0x00007f920fd86693 in Akonadi::ResourceBase::init (r=0x1fcec60) at ../../akonadi/resourcebase.cpp:451 #38 0x000000000041ebd3 in Akonadi::ResourceBase::init<MixedMaildirResource> (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/akonadi/resourcebase.h:188 #39 0x00007f920c43676d in __libc_start_main (main=0x40fef0 <main(int, char**)>, argc=3, ubp_av=0x7fffa55e5d88, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffa55e5d78) at libc-start.c:226 #40 0x000000000040ff85 in _start () Possible duplicates by query: bug 300103. Reported using DrKonqi
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300103 ***
(In reply to comment #1) > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300103 *** Could you tell me how you determined this bug was a duplicate please so I can better flag future bugs.
(In reply to comment #2) > Could you tell me how you determined this bug was a duplicate please so I > can better flag future bugs. Well, drkonqi has already given the hint of duplicate. I just compare the last a few lines (#6 ~ #15) of the backtrace of the two reports to make sure.
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 22:17:22 you wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312637 > > --- Comment #3 from Jekyll Wu <adaptee@gmail.com> --- > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Could you tell me how you determined this bug was a duplicate please so I > > can better flag future bugs. > > Well, drkonqi has already given the hint of duplicate. I just compare the > last a few lines (#6 ~ #15) of the backtrace of the two reports to make > sure. Thanks.