Bug 309861 - passive, non-intrusive progress bar
Summary: passive, non-intrusive progress bar
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: kdialog
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Other
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brad Hards
URL:
Keywords:
: 256798 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-11-10 15:09 UTC by bugmenot
Modified: 2016-06-06 10:51 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bugmenot 2012-11-10 15:09:45 UTC
I like to have a passive, non-intrusive progress bar.

A combination of kdialog --passivepopup and kdialog --progressbar. For
example, when copying files with dolphin such a progress bar will be
used. I want the same for my own scripts.
 
I am referring to the progress display that folds into the desktop's notification area.

The D-Bus name for the service is org.kde.JobViewServer.

A Mailing List Thread question resulted in this feature request.
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde&m=135170466924126&w=2

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Kai Uwe Broulik 2012-11-10 23:23:24 UTC
I already played with the thought of adding this to kdialog but somehow the JobViewServer doesn't work properly here when I call it using qdbus, so no idea if it will work better when being invoked by kdialog.
Comment 2 Kevin Krammer 2012-11-16 18:25:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> I already played with the thought of adding this to kdialog but somehow the
> JobViewServer doesn't work properly here when I call it using qdbus, so no
> idea if it will work better when being invoked by kdialog.

It most certainly requires that the application using it stays around during the operation, i.e. not terminating right after the call like qdbus would.
kdialog could do that, i.e. staying around during the progress handling is what it already does when displaying the progress dialog
Comment 3 Maarten De Meyer 2014-06-08 22:24:55 UTC
*** Bug 256798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***