Below you see an example of a filter log entry. There is no reference to the filtered massage (Subject, From, To, Messageid). If you received many mails and some are filtered and some are not / filtered wrong you have no hint which entry in the log belongs to the which message. [20:29:33] Evaluating filter rules: (match all of the following) "X-Spam-Flag" <contains> "YES" [20:29:33] 0 = "X-Spam-Flag" <contains> "YES" () [20:29:33] Evaluating filter rules: (match all of the following) "X-Cron-Env" <contains> "<SHELL" [20:29:33] 1 = "X-Cron-Env" <contains> "<SHELL" (<SHELL=/bin/sh>) [20:29:33] Filter rules have matched. [20:29:33] Applying filter action: Move Into Folder "Lokale Ordner/Cron" Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Filter mail. Actual Results: No reference to the mail in the filter log. Expected Results: Reference in the filter log. Maybe the message id is the best reference to keep the log small. Message time, from, to, cc,subject ... would a good idea.
I confirm it. Will look at how to implement it.
Git commit c3ab534d099f4b5da439d5c559df661e36e0e049 by Montel Laurent. Committed on 28/09/2012 at 09:19. Pushed by mlaurent into branch 'master'. Fix Bug 306856 - No reference to mail in the filter log FIXED-IN: 4.10 I just added when we start to log a message which display "subject"/"date"/"from" For me it will enough M +8 -1 mailfilteragent/filtermanager.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kdepim/c3ab534d099f4b5da439d5c559df661e36e0e049