Hi all, With Gwenview 2.9.0, I can no longer run the kipi plugin image send by email. Use of this gwenview crashes completely. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Plugins 2. Batch 3. Pictures by e-mail Actual Results: Gwenview crash In console mode : gwenview(4440)/KIPI (general) KIPI::Interface::thumbnails: This should only be invoked if the host application supports KIPI::Features ( HostSupportsThumbnails ). If host application do support that, then this function should have been overridden in the KIPI host interface. gwenview(4440)/KIPI (general) KIPI::Interface::thumbnails: This should only be invoked if the host application supports KIPI::Features ( HostSupportsThumbnails ). If host application do support that, then this function should have been overridden in the KIPI host interface. gwenview(4440)/KIPI (general) KIPI::Interface::progressThumbnailChanged: This should only be invoked if the host application supports KIPI::Features ( HostSupportsProgressBar ). If host application do support that, then this function should have been overridden in the KIPI host interface. gwenview(4440)/KIPI (general) KIPI::Interface::progressThumbnailChanged: This should only be invoked if the host application supports KIPI::Features ( HostSupportsProgressBar ). If host application do support that, then this function should have been overridden in the KIPI host interface. gwenview: Fatal IO error: client killed
No backtrace ? Smells like binary incompatibility.
For the backtrace. Sorry, il couldn't grenerate it... I dont't know why... Application: gwenview (2.9.0) KDE Platform Version: 4.9.00 Qt Version: 4.8.2 Operating System: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic x86_64 Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS -- Information about the crash: With Gwenview 2.9.0, I can no longer run the kipi plugin image send by email. Use of this gwenview crashes completely. The crash can be reproduced every time. -- Backtrace: A useful backtrace could not be generated
Created attachment 73533 [details] New crash information added by DrKonqi gwenview (2.9.0) on KDE Platform 4.9.00 using Qt 4.8.2 - What I was doing when the application crashed: an export by mail has the same problems as export to picassa web. - Custom settings of the application: -- Backtrace (Reduced): #6 0x00007f750de4898f in parent (this=0x3268b20) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qobject.h:273 #7 parentWidget (this=0x3268b20) at ../../include/QtGui/../../src/gui/kernel/qwidget.h:1033 #8 QLayout::addChildWidget (this=<optimized out>, w=0x3268b20) at kernel/qlayout.cpp:992 #9 0x00007f750de2bc07 in QBoxLayout::insertWidget (this=<optimized out>, index=-1, widget=0x3268b20, stretch=0, alignment=...) at kernel/qboxlayout.cpp:1032 #10 0x00007f750de2be5b in QBoxLayout::addWidget (this=<optimized out>, widget=<optimized out>, stretch=<optimized out>, alignment=...) at kernel/qboxlayout.cpp:1112
It crash in picasaweb export tool. Can you install kipi-plugins debug package and get a new complete backtrace ? Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 73538 [details] New crash information added by DrKonqi gwenview (2.9.0) on KDE Platform 4.9.00 using Qt 4.8.2 - What I was doing when the application crashed: With kipi-plugins debug package. Bugs 305811 and 304763 seems similars - Custom settings of the application: -- Backtrace (Reduced): #7 QVariant::operator= (this=0x7fff34e52a00, variant=...) at kernel/qvariant.cpp:1797 #8 0x00007fc339771d8c in KIPIPlugins::KPHostSettings::metadataSettings() const () from /usr/lib/libkipiplugins.so.2 #9 0x00007fc339767c9d in KIPIPlugins::KPMetadata::init() () from /usr/lib/libkipiplugins.so.2 [...] #16 0x00007fc35ce29192 in KJob::result (this=<optimized out>, _t1=0x3855830) at ./kjob.moc:208 #17 0x00007fc35ce291d0 in KJob::emitResult (this=0x3855830) at ../../kdecore/jobs/kjob.cpp:318
Same backtrace and same problem than #304763 Giles Caulier *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 304763 ***
This just noticed that the problem of export by mail only happens when I stipulates an adjustment of picture settings. Otherwise, export mail is OK. However, resizing the images (in the "collections") is also OK. The algorithm of resizing images in the "collections" would be different from that in the "Batch -> Images by e-mail?"