User-Agent: Build Identifier: When I exportet a pic to gimp an re-opende in digikam, all metadata from exposure were kept. When working on reimported pic batch: - change size - minimize noise - sharpen - use watermark (text) all metadate were loosen Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. as described above 2. 3. Expected Results: digikam should keep metadata in any case- but in cases, where one wants to erase these explicitely as metadata are crucial informations, I take this as a "major severity"
Not reproducible here. Which file format you use ? Gilles Caulier
last years NIKON: jpg + NIKON NEF Axel Am 15.04.2012 10:35, schrieb Gilles Caulier: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298158 > > Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |caulier.gilles@gmail.com > > --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> --- > Not reproducible here. Which file format you use ? > > Gilles Caulier >
Official digiKam 2.6.0 release is out since few days now : http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/656 Please, check if this entry still valid, or update report accordingly. Thanks in advance. Gilles Caulier
Hey Gilles, at least for Exposure Blending its still valid in 2.6.0. At least most of the EXIF info is overwritten. Editing doesn't delete them. At least here. greets
Ronny: Exposure blending is a kipi plugin. I didn't try, it should probably copy a sbuset of the metadata from one of the images. If it does not, please file a bug against that. Axel: Is this about batch editing or image editor? You give four steps. Does any pick of these delete metadata, or only a specific tool?
Marcel, please give me a little time Axel Am 21.07.2012 15:03, schrieb Marcel Wiesweg: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298158 > > --- Comment #5 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel.wiesweg@gmx.de> --- > Ronny: Exposure blending is a kipi plugin. I didn't try, it should probably > copy a sbuset of the metadata from one of the images. If it does not, please > file a bug against that. > > Axel: Is this about batch editing or image editor? You give four steps. Does > any pick of these delete metadata, or only a specific tool? >
Axel, Ronny, Outside the fact that it can be a problem with ExpoBlending tool as you mention in comment #4, what's the status of this entry when you use the original workflow explained in top entry of this file ? Note : ExpoBlending mix more than one image to a target and use Enfuse command line tool from Hugin project. It's probably a bug in this program tool, and this must be reported to this project. After all ExpoBlending is just a front end to setup pool of image to mix and to config parameters. Gilles Caulier
Can you refresh the status of this file using last digiKam 4.2.0 ? Gilles Caulier
I think you can close it as resolved... Thanks.