Version: 4.6.1 (using KDE 4.8.0) OS: Linux If you create some operation and provide a payee (first), then define several splits (sub-operations on accounts) for it, then their payee belongs to be the same as in your operation you defined. If you later modify your operation with different payee, then payee of splits (sub-operations) stay unchanged, still pointing to old one from that initially created. This makes a strange situation where full amount of general operation displays for first payee, and the same amount of splits displays for second payee (e.g. on different one) I dont know if this is a common feature, or just a bug, but sometimes it works somehow. Reproducible: Didn't try Steps to Reproduce: See details Actual Results: Strange Expected Results: Do not know OS: Linux (x86_64) release 3.0.0-16-server Compiler: gcc
Actually this is the way it should work. After the transaction is created (when the initial data is used) both ends of the transaction (splits from each account) can be edited independently. This is also true for the memo fields.