Bug 290883 - kmail polls every mail folder twice
Summary: kmail polls every mail folder twice
Status: RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED
Alias: None
Product: kmail2
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 4.7
Platform: Fedora RPMs Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-01-07 14:47 UTC by Martin Fahrendorf
Modified: 2017-01-07 22:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Fahrendorf 2012-01-07 14:47:22 UTC 
Version:           4.7 (using KDE 4.7.4) 
OS:                Linux

As imap idle is not working for me I use cyclic polling. With this every mail folder is opened twice on every poll. Neither kmail1 did this nor any other mail client (thunderbird).

I use online imap with a cyrus imap server (version 2.3.7)

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
enable cyclic polling and watch imap servers log file (or enable imap debuging)

Actual Results:  
every imap mail folder is opened twice

Expected Results:  
should use the imap internal structures (seen_db on cyrus) and opens the folder only if it is selected on user request.

OS: Linux (x86_64) release 3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Comment 1 Martin Fahrendorf 2012-04-24 15:43:22 UTC 
This is still the case with kmail/akonadi from KDE 4.8.2.
Comment 2 Denis Kurz 2016-09-24 18:09:42 UTC 
This bug has only been reported for versions before 4.14, which have been unsupported for at least two years now. Can anyone tell if this bug still present?

If noone confirms this bug for a Framework-based version of kmail2 (version 5.0 or later, as part of KDE Applications 15.12 or later), it gets closed in about three months.
Comment 3 Denis Kurz 2017-01-07 22:26:49 UTC 
Just as announced in my last comment, I close this bug. If you encounter it again in a recent version (at least 5.0 aka 15.08), please open a new one unless it already exists. Thank you for all your input.