Created attachment 64410 [details] view of configuration, schedule & ledger Version: 4.6.0 (using KDE 4.4.5) OS: Linux I have set the "number of days to preview schedules in ledger -> 30", however not all scheduled transactions appear, if any. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: create scheduled transaction, see if they appear in ledger. Actual Results: not all scheduled transactions appear, if any. Expected Results: all scheduled transactions _should_ appear, if any. saved my data anonymously, reopened kmymoney2 using that file, same, same.
it has been found that this will occur when the primary sort of the ledger is set to 'reconcile'. regardless of the ledger sort, I think that scheduled transactions should be displayed in the register. Maybe under a header of future/pending/scheduled,..._something_
(In reply to comment #1) > it has been found that this will occur when the primary sort of the ledger is > set to 'reconcile'. > > regardless of the ledger sort, I think that scheduled transactions should be > displayed in the register. Maybe under a header of > future/pending/scheduled,..._something_ this of course presumes the appropriate settings under configure->schedule transactions.
I can confirm that changing the sort order does change whether or not a future scheduled transaction is displayed in the ledger. I'll try to create a sample kmy file.
The scheduled transactions are shown in the ledger only if the primary sort key is the post date on purpose. This is because only then the 'Future transactions' separator is added in the ledger. Maybe we can get rid of this condition and always display the scheduled transactions in the ledger. This would be OK if one argues that the future transactions are displayed differently anyway (dimmed). We just need to be careful to add this feature, if we add it, in a way that does not generate future bug reports. Comments are welcomed on how to do this; meanwhile I'm changing this to a whishlist item.
While 5.1 seems to still only show future scheduled transactions if the sort order is primary date ascending, current master shows them for any sort order (that I have tested.) They are shown very dim, so they are definitely distinguishable, but not very readable. Is there a better status then CONFIRMED, as I don't think it should be FIXED until it is actually closer to being released.