Bug 279583 - Simple progress bar makes xorg consume 8% CPU of a 2.1 GHz dual core
Summary: Simple progress bar makes xorg consume 8% CPU of a 2.1 GHz dual core
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 275061
Alias: None
Product: Oxygen
Classification: Plasma
Component: win deco (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unassigned bugs mailing-list
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-07 11:12 UTC by S. Burmeister
Modified: 2012-06-07 12:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description S. Burmeister 2011-08-07 11:12:52 UTC
Version:           unspecified (using KDE 4.7.0) 
OS:                Linux

Assuming that kmail uses the "general" KDE progress bar this is a KDE issue. If it's a kmail2 issue, please re-assign.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
- Check xorg's cpu consumption

- Open kmail2 and watch the bottom-right corner of the app, i.e. the status bar.
- Make kmail2 perform several tasks at once in order to not get the x% progress bar but a simple little rectangle moving from side to side.

- Check xorg's CPU consumption while the rectangle is moving

Actual Results:  
Xorg consumes 8% of a 2.1 GHz dual core CPU just for a tiny little rectangle moving from side to side.

Expected Results:  
Hardly any cpu consumption for such a trivial animation.

There were issues in digikam with it using paint() for the "progress circles", i.e. those dots turning. Maybe this issue is also due to using not well performing painting methods.
Comment 1 Christophe Marin 2011-08-07 22:45:38 UTC
worksforme. No particular Xorg usage when syncing messages while filtering and changing folder
Comment 2 S. Burmeister 2011-08-07 23:00:06 UTC
What do you mean by particular? It would be strange if changing a folder, i.e. displaying a new message list would not result in some percentage regarding Xorg.

Do you use the default theme/windeco?
Comment 3 Christoph Feck 2011-08-08 00:04:45 UTC
See also bug 275061.
Comment 4 Christophe Marin 2011-08-08 08:01:29 UTC
That could explain, indeed. I don't use the oxygen decorations
Comment 5 S. Burmeister 2012-06-07 11:59:29 UTC
So this might then be an oxygen issue.
Comment 6 Christoph Feck 2012-06-07 12:22:03 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 275061 ***