Created attachment 52947 [details] notification text after moving pictures Version: 2.0.0 (using KDE 4.5.2) OS: Linux I selected some pictures in an existing album and chose "move to album" from the right-click context menu. I created a new album/folder and clicked ok. After the moving was finished digikam send a notification to the systray which only showed some html, i.e. <a ...., as you can see in the screenshot attached. Reproducible: Didn't try
Marcel, What's that ? Gilles Caulier
I think that's done by KIO. I dont know of any code where we'd send something to the nofication framework after copying
Just switched to 1.5 from 1.2 and I am now witnessing the same message ... I move a folder from one collection to another collection and the result of the move is displayed in the notification framework as html ...
I just checked out the source from the 1.2.0 branch, and the problem described in this report is still present. So I don't think it is a digiKam error, but a kdelibs issue? At least they seem to have changed API calls that we are using in a wrong way?
Created attachment 62752 [details] popup after move
Comment on attachment 62752 [details] popup after move Well, we're in 2.0.0 and it seems we're still displaying junk when moving albums across collections ... I know this is only cosmetics but when time permits ....
Sven, I cannot reproduce here. This file still valid using digiKam 2.4 ? Gilles Caulier
Created attachment 66783 [details] problem still here in 2.3
Well, I'm only running 2.3 but the problem is still here; see attached screenshot, I just took it. Maybe the description of the problem is misleading. The pop-up doesn't actually display HTML ... it displays destinations as complex strings with parameters most of which are HTML-URL Encoded (%2F instead of / for example). The net is that this information in the pop-up is absolutely unintelligible for the mere mortal ... Might as well remove it altogether and just leave it as "X files have been moved" if it's not possible to display something sensible.
Vincent, What's news about this file with digiKam 3.5.0 ? Gilles Caulier
I'm still on 3.4 but it now works nicely ! Didn't notice what version actually fixed it though .... I'm closing the defect. Thanks team !
(In reply to comment #11) > I'm closing the defect. Thanks team ! Oops, I thought I was the owner of that one, can't close it myself ;)