Bug 254320 - KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso wrong checksum?
Summary: KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso wrong checksum?
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: www.kde.org
Classification: Websites
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kde-www mailing-list
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-10-16 01:50 UTC by vvvv
Modified: 2015-01-27 22:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description vvvv 2010-10-16 01:50:58 UTC 
Version:           unspecified (using KDE 4.5.2) 
OS:                Linux

<http://home.kde.org/~kdelive/#reloaded>
states checksum (sha256sum) to be
f6241d8574b4706fd41e5f2a7d3e737808d7415317c29be74cbea5be14bd9d99  KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso

After download from two different mirrors I obtain always same different checksum
a5cec3063118143724f11a3f023fcd1dfbf167f022fc41ffe8c9ccb5571c53a6  KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
> sha256sum KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso


Actual Results:  
a5cec3063118143724f11a3f023fcd1dfbf167f022fc41ffe8c9ccb5571c53a6  KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso


Expected Results:  
f6241d8574b4706fd41e5f2a7d3e737808d7415317c29be74cbea5be14bd9d99  KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso

The information on <http://home.kde.org/~kdelive/#reloaded> may be incorrect?
The binaries on the mirrors are corrupt?

File size in both cases 695 MiB:
> ll KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso
-rw-r--r-- 1 vvvv xxx 728760320 16. Okt 01:31 KDE-Reloaded.x86_64-4.5.2-Build1.6.iso
Comment 1 Christoph Feck 2010-10-16 03:04:46 UTC 
Not sure if these are official KDE builds, the WWW team should know better.
Comment 2 Ben Cooksley 2010-11-13 05:05:31 UTC 
Will, can you please check this?
Comment 3 William Entriken 2015-01-27 22:02:44 UTC 
I am not seeing any checksums now. Recommending close
Comment 4 Ben Cooksley 2015-01-27 22:30:20 UTC 
I concur, in any event these ISOs are likely extremely out of date and unlikely to be used by anyone.