Version: unspecified (using KDE 4.4.2) OS: Linux Hello, I need to know, of which kind DIGIKAMs watermarking is; unfortunately there are TWO places, one can find "watermarking" 1.) in Help: -> Chapter 2 Using digiKam -> Digital Asset Management (DAM) with digiKam -> Protect your authorship and copyleft/right -> Digital Watermarking (DW) ... Digital Watermarking (DW)... "Digital Watermarking refers to an invisible digital watermark that is..." 2.) In batch queue manager(BQM): -> EXTRA ("EXTRA") -> Stapelverarbeitung (batch queue manager) -> Wasserzeichen hinzufügen (add watermark, with some configurations ) QUESTIONs: - is the realization the SAME in _both_ cases? - is this info STORED an integral part of a pic in a holographic way (comp. 1.)? - is there a way to CHECK if watermarking was sucessful - how can I SEE this information as copyright OWNER? - how can I SEE this information of OTHER copyright OWNER? - is their a tool to check DIGIKAMS and others(!!!) watermarks?? Sorry, I know, these lots of questions. Hope for answers Axel Sources: - http://scribblesandsnaps.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/watermark-photos-with-digikam/ - http://www.gerhard.fr/DAM/ Reproducible: Always Would be nice to have a neutral type platform- at the moment, we can report: - a BIG which refers to misworking of existing software - a WISH which shall help improving existing software - NO way just to put a simple QUESTION?
- is the realization the SAME in _both_ cases? ??? - is this info STORED an integral part of a pic in a holographic way (comp. 1.)? No just text. - is there a way to CHECK if watermarking was sucessful It's a visual stuff over the picture... - how can I SEE this information as copyright OWNER? - how can I SEE this information of OTHER copyright OWNER? Use metadata viewer. To set (c) in metadat, use metadata template. - is their a tool to check DIGIKAMS and others(!!!) watermarks?? no response relevant. No visible wartermarking is pattented method. This cannot be implemented in open-source. Note : Bugzilla is to way to report problem or to post whishes, not to ask simple question. Use mailing list for that. Gilles Caulier