Bug 250284 - Incorrect date format in template for Lithuanian
Summary: Incorrect date format in template for Lithuanian
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 250288
Alias: None
Product: i18n
Classification: Translations
Component: lt (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Donatas Glodenis
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-05 16:09 UTC by opensuse.lietuviu.kalba
Modified: 2011-05-13 01:36 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description opensuse.lietuviu.kalba 2010-09-05 16:09:08 UTC
Version:           1.13.5 (using KDE 4.5.0) 
OS:                Linux

If I press „Replay“, I see this added line:

„On 2010 m. Rugsėjis 5 d., sekmadienis 16:33:28 you wrote:“

But the date „2010 m. Rugsėjis 5 d.“ is incorrect! It may would be the same meaning if you see in English „2010 of September. Day of 5“.
Should be „2010 m. rugsėjo 5 d.“. Because in Lithuanian language the last letters of month changes accordingly the context. „Rugsėjis“ would be correct, if it is used separately.

You may want to try this:
LANG=lt_LT
date -d "2010-09-05 12:34:56"  +%c


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. change lokale to Lithuanian.
2. open KMail
3. Replay to Mail

Actual Results:  
Incorrect date format in first line:
„2010 m. Rugsėjis 5 d.“

Expected Results:  
Correct date format:
„2010 m. rugsėjo 5 d.“

OS: Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.34-12-desktop
Compiler: gcc
Comment 1 Christophe Marin 2011-04-25 01:42:58 UTC
Reassign to Lithuanian translators. I have no idea whether the issue still exists in kmail2 nor if there's a way to fix it.

the file is kdepim/libtemplateparser.po
Comment 2 opensuse.lietuviu.kalba 2011-05-07 10:09:11 UTC
I don't think, that it is translation problem. The similar problem is with clock: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250288
Comment 3 Andrius Štikonas 2011-05-13 01:36:31 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 250288 ***