Bug 242303 - okular djvu search doesn't find multi-word strings
Summary: okular djvu search doesn't find multi-word strings
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 230787
Alias: None
Product: okular
Classification: Applications
Component: DjVu backend (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Okular developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-20 23:09 UTC by Andreas K. Huettel
Modified: 2010-06-26 15:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andreas K. Huettel 2010-06-20 23:09:31 UTC
Version:           unspecified (using KDE 4.4.4) 
OS:                Linux

This is a clone of http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316529


Single word searching works fine.

When searching a djvu file for two or more words, okular returns zero results.
When using app-text/djview4-4.5, multiple word searching works fine.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.search a djvu file for any two-word combination, eg. "the imf"
2.okular runs through whole djvu document
3.returns zero results


Actual Results:  
Returns zero occurences of any multiple word search.


Expected Results:  
Okular whould have found the search string and moved to the first page where
the string occured.
Comment 1 Pino Toscano 2010-06-21 18:51:53 UTC
> 1.search a djvu file for any two-word combination, eg. "the imf"

What if you search without the space, ie "theimf"?
Comment 2 Andreas K. Huettel 2010-06-22 19:22:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> > 1.search a djvu file for any two-word combination, eg. "the imf"
> 
> What if you search without the space, ie "theimf"?

it finds and highlights the occurrence then...
Comment 3 Pino Toscano 2010-06-26 15:49:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > > 1.search a djvu file for any two-word combination, eg. "the imf"
> > 
> > What if you search without the space, ie "theimf"?
> 
> it finds and highlights the occurrence then...

Right, same reason as #230787.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 230787 ***