Bug 229188 - Can't play the MP3 file "Joe Satriani - 04 - Cool #9.mp3" (due to the "#" in the name)
Summary: Can't play the MP3 file "Joe Satriani - 04 - Cool #9.mp3" (due to the "#" in ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 194889
Alias: None
Product: amarok
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 2.2.0
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Amarok Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-03 00:08 UTC by tictoc
Modified: 2010-03-04 12:23 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tictoc 2010-03-03 00:08:07 UTC 
Version:           2.2.0 (using KDE 4.3.2)
OS:                Linux

The file "Joe Satriani - 04 - Cool #9.mp3" can't be played by Amarok... But, if I remove the "#", it's ok.
Comment 1 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-03-03 10:13:44 UTC 
Which Phonon backend do you use? If it is Gstreamer, then this is a duplicate of bug 198008

Also, please upgrade to Amarok 2.2.2 which is the latest stable version.
Comment 2 tictoc 2010-03-03 20:55:31 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Which Phonon backend do you use? If it is Gstreamer, then this is a duplicate
> of bug 198008
> 
> Also, please upgrade to Amarok 2.2.2 which is the latest stable version.

Thank you,
Indeed, it's ok with the new release of Amarok v2.2.2

More informations:
- OS : Ubuntu 9.10 x64 (default Gnome desktop + French language packages + Amarok)
- Only the package "Phonon Xine 1.1.x backend" is used (the package "Phonon GStreamer 0.10.x backend" is not installed).
Comment 3 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-03-03 22:55:22 UTC 
hm, setting status correctly.
Comment 4 tictoc 2010-03-04 12:21:29 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> hm, setting status correctly.

Ok, so for Amarok v2.2.0, this bug is not fixed.

An other information, (only) Amarok v2.2.0 don't play files whith a "#" inside his name but for VLC 1.0.2 it's ok.
Comment 5 Mikko C. 2010-03-04 12:23:21 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 194889 ***