Bug 228010 - Let flickr export progress bar show progress of each image
Summary: Let flickr export progress bar show progress of each image
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Plugin-WebService-Flickr (show other bugs)
Version: 5.6.0
Platform: Arch Linux Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-22 09:15 UTC by Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Modified: 2018-01-30 21:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 4.11.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 2010-02-22 09:15:08 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.4.0)
Compiler:          64-bit 
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Archlinux Packages

The flickr export plugin currently only updates the uploading progressDlg on FlickrWindow::slotAddPhotoSucceeded. 

For those of us on slow/quirky wifi connections who sometimes upload one or two huge photos, it would be great to have some feedback on how far each photo has come.
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2011-12-22 13:13:28 UTC
Kevin,

This file still valid using kipi-plugins 2.4 ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 Shourya Singh Gupta 2015-05-16 17:50:35 UTC
This bug is not valid anymore. So for example : If I try to upload 4 photos, so upon uploading of each image the progress bar increases by 25%.
Comment 3 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer 2015-05-18 06:45:59 UTC
(In reply to Shourya Singh Gupta from comment #2)
> This bug is not valid anymore. So for example : If I try to upload 4 photos,
> so upon uploading of each image the progress bar increases by 25%.

I was talking about progress for the individual images – for instance when uploading one image of 20mb, there was no indication of how far along it was. So if I take your word for it, this bug is actually not fixed. 

However, I switched for frogr some time ago, so if everyone left using kipi is happy with no per-image progress it sounds like a WORKSFORME situation :)