Bug 21649 - Link input type=reset to Undo
Summary: Link input type=reset to Undo
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Other
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-03-06 00:48 UTC by Rob Kaper
Modified: 2012-08-04 23:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rob Kaper 2001-03-06 00:10:37 UTC
(*** This bug was imported into bugs.kde.org ***)

Package: konqueror
Severity: wishlist
Revision: cvsup 2001-03-05

I just clicked on the wrong button in a form the input type="reset" one
instead of the submit one. It would be handy if pushing that button can be
undone with Undo.

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper | cap@capsi.com cap@capsi.net cap@capsi.co.uk
          | http://capsi.com/ - telnet://chat.capsi.com:2300/
          | 'What? In riddles?' said Gandalf. 'No! For I was talking aloud
          | to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person
          | present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young
          | are wearying.' - "Lord of the Rings" JRR Tolkien
Comment 1 Dirk Mueller 2001-03-06 01:21:49 UTC
On Die 06 M=E4r 2001 Rob Kaper wrote:

> Package: konqueror
> Severity: wishlist
> Revision: cvsup 2001-03-05
>=20
> I just clicked on the wrong button in a form the input type=3D"reset" one
> instead of the submit one. It would be handy if pushing that button can be
> undone with Undo.

I agree but which "undo" button ? :)

hmm maybe some kind of confirmation.. but usually the page itself takes=20
care of that so its difficult to implement that without causing duplicated=
=20
confirmations for some cases.=20


Dirk
Comment 2 Rob Kaper 2001-03-06 01:30:25 UTC
On Tue Mar 06 2001 at 02:21:49AM +0100 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > I just clicked on the wrong button in a form the input type="reset" one
> > instead of the submit one. It would be handy if pushing that button can be
> > undone with Undo.
> 
> I agree but which "undo" button ? :)

Who said anything about a Undo *button*? "Edit -> Undo" from the menu or
plain ^Z would be nice. :-)

> hmm maybe some kind of confirmation.. but usually the page itself takes 
> care of that so its difficult to implement that without causing duplicated 
> confirmations for some cases. 

If that is done it is usually some sort of form.onReset (or whatever it is
called exactly) in Javascript shouldn't be too hard to check for the
presence of that or is it?
-- 
Rob Kaper | cap@capsi.com cap@capsi.net cap@capsi.co.uk
          | http://capsi.com/ - telnet://chat.capsi.com:2300/
          | 'What? In riddles?' said Gandalf. 'No! For I was talking aloud
          | to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person
          | present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young
          | are wearying.' - "Lord of the Rings" JRR Tolkien
Comment 3 Rob Kaper 2001-03-06 01:41:43 UTC
On Tue Mar 06 2001 at 02:35:57AM +0100 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> hmm. but it requires quite some infrastructure because the data isn`t
> stored at all currently ;)

It isn't? It is cached when I submit the page and go back so it must be
stored somewhere in that case.. or it is being read and restored from the
post/get variables in the history?

> > If that is done it is usually some sort of form.onReset (or whatever it
> > is called exactly) in Javascript shouldn't be too hard to check for the
> > presence of that or is it?
> 
> well it could be onClick as well. and we would need a flag if those event 
> handlers did some user interaction because usually they only change some 
> javascript variables. 

Sounds looks like Undo would be a better idea. :) I hate popups anyway.

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper | cap@capsi.com cap@capsi.net cap@capsi.co.uk
          | http://capsi.com/ - telnet://chat.capsi.com:2300/
          | 'What? In riddles?' said Gandalf. 'No! For I was talking aloud
          | to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person
          | present to speak to; the long explanations needed by the young
          | are wearying.' - "Lord of the Rings" JRR Tolkien
Comment 4 Adrián Chaves (Gallaecio) 2012-07-28 14:01:09 UTC
This issue has been moved upstream to the WebKit bug tracker (remember WebKit can be used by both Rekonq and Konqueror).

https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=154375&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&order=changeddate

Please, close this issue.
Comment 5 Myriam Schweingruber 2012-07-31 22:20:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> This issue has been moved upstream to the WebKit bug tracker (remember
> WebKit can be used by both Rekonq and Konqueror).
> 
> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.
> cgi?list_id=154375&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&order=changeddate
> 
> Please, close this issue.

Thank you for the feedback. Could you please also provide a link to the upstream report? The link you posted doesn't seem related
Comment 6 Adrián Chaves (Gallaecio) 2012-08-01 05:18:24 UTC
Ups, sorry: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92577
Comment 7 Myriam Schweingruber 2012-08-04 23:20:49 UTC
Thank you for the fast feedback.