Version: 0.2.0 (using KDE 4.3.2) Compiler: i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) OS: OS X Installed from: Mac OS X (Fink) Packages kipi-plugins does not compile under Mac OS X. I tried it under Snow Leopard, but it will probably effect all Mac OS versions. The problem is, that kipi-plugins get in a way configured, that it tries to build the aquireimages plugin which uses ksane. Ksane is not available for Mac OS as far as I know. It seems to me that a if-clause was forgotten in the CMakeLists.txt for excluding aquireimages on Mac systems. I will attach a patch to this bug report adding the missing if-clause to CMakeLists.txt. However this patch is not sufficient to compile kipi-plugins under Mac OS X, because dngconverter fails also to build. But that seems to be another problem and I will file another bug report for that.
Are you sure about version 0.2.0? That version is really old.
Created attachment 37949 [details] Patch for CMakeLists.txt adding if-clause to prevent acquireimages from being build on Mac OS.
Yes, I'm sure about the version. It's the newest (stable) version of kipi-plugins for KDE 4 released at March 22nd. See the topmost post at http://www.kipi-plugins.org/drupal/
I'm not agree with this patch. AcquireImages plugin compile fine under Linux too Also, libksane from trunk use Twain for windows. Twain iterface also exist from MAC, so current code from svn of libksane must compile fine under MAC, and AcquireImage too... Gilles Caulier
No. kipi-plugins web site is fully outdated. all fresh news are posted to digikam.org web site. Please, update... http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/481 Gilles Caulier
I just noticed, that I filled in the wrong platform. Normally I use the Macports packages (therefore I was a bit to quick to chose this option). In fact I used the source tarball to compile it. Can someone change the platform of the bug report? I'm sorry for this mistake.
Ok, probably you can close this bug. I did not know that http://www.kipi-plugins.org/drupal/ is outdated. It would be good to make this clear at that website, because it is also the first hit if you use Google. But thanks for pointing me to the right version!