Bug 203031 - Album list doesn't show pictures even after tons of new pictures were imported
Summary: Album list doesn't show pictures even after tons of new pictures were imported
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Database-Albums (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0.0
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-08 01:46 UTC by Manuel Koch
Modified: 2017-07-25 19:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 5.7.0


Attachments
screenshot showing empty albums (158.33 KB, image/png)
2009-08-08 01:48 UTC, Manuel Koch
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Manuel Koch 2009-08-08 01:46:40 UTC
Version:           1.0.0-beta3 (using 4.3.00 (KDE 4.3.0), Debian packages)
Compiler:          cc
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.30.1mko

- Using digikam with german translation
- Created new album directory
- moved hundreds of image files into this directory
- From menu, used "Extras" -> "Search for new pictures"
- digikam found all the images/directories I moved into the directory during
  searching for new files

After the update-dialog is gone, the list
only shows empty albums ( see attached screenshot ).
Clicking on one of the albums doesn't show any image !?

Restarting digikam did not solve the problem.

The files reside on a mounted vfat directory.
The root of the album directories has the following permissions :
ls -al Pictures
insgesamt 6148
drwsrwsrwx 11 nobody nogroup    4096  8. Aug 01:32 .
drwxr-xr-x  9 root   root       4096  8. Aug 01:20 ..
drwxrwxrwx  5 nobody nogroup    4096  8. Aug 01:18 Autos
-rw-r--r--  1 manuel nogroup 6217728  8. Aug 01:32 digikam4.db
-rw-------  1 manuel nogroup      47  8. Aug 01:29 .directory
drwxrwxrwx 50 nobody nogroup    4096 31. Jul 12:58 Familie
drwxrwxrwx 15 nobody nogroup    4096 10. Jan 2009  Freunde
drwxrwxrwx  5 nobody nogroup    4096  7. Jun 2007  Musik
drwxr-sr-x  5 manuel nogroup    4096  8. Aug 00:38 Panorama
drwxrwxrwx  2 nobody nogroup    4096 16. Okt 2007  Referenz
-rw-r--r--  1 manuel nogroup   13312  8. Aug 01:32 thumbnails-digikam.db
drwxrwxrwx 31 nobody nogroup    4096  7. Jul 20:32 Urlaub_Reisen
drwxrwxrwx 12 nobody nogroup    4096  7. Okt 2008  Verschiedenes
drwxrwxrwx  2 nobody nogroup    4096  8. Jan 2008  Wallpaper
Comment 1 Manuel Koch 2009-08-08 01:48:52 UTC
Created attachment 35980 [details]
screenshot showing empty albums
Comment 2 Manuel Koch 2009-08-08 01:50:35 UTC
PS: The directory is an ext3 mount
Comment 3 Andi Clemens 2009-08-08 02:13:17 UTC
*** Bug 203030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Andi Clemens 2009-08-08 02:13:23 UTC
*** Bug 203028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Michael G. Hansen 2009-08-08 05:58:11 UTC
Which version of the debian-digikam package do you have? ( apt-cache policy digikam ) 2:1.0.0~beta3-1 is known to have these symptoms, but they are fixed in 2:1.0.0~beta3-1+b1. 2:1.0.0~beta3-1+b1 is available in the repositories, so you can easily upgrade to it:

apt-get update && apt-get install digikam
Comment 6 Manuel Koch 2009-08-08 09:46:31 UTC
Sorry for submitting this bug multiple times...

My installed version is 2:1.0.0~beta3-1

I will install the latest version as soon as it's available on a official 
debian repository ( as this seems to be ok, according to digikam website:
"Debian repositories are mostly up to date, release candidates and beta's 
usually are available from the experimental repository." )

I retry this issue after new version is installed.
Comment 7 Marcel Wiesweg 2009-08-08 13:49:04 UTC
This is usually a packaging problem with the kioslaves, not found, duplicate versions installed, binarily incompatible, whatever
Comment 8 Manuel Koch 2009-08-09 13:50:25 UTC
...and what does this mean ??
Can I do something to solve it ?
Comment 9 caulier.gilles 2009-08-15 10:24:47 UTC
From digiKam team, nothing can be done.

Check new packages, ask to Distro team for better packaging...

You can also compile digiKam by hand and install it properly...

Gilles Caulier
Comment 10 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 2009-10-04 13:53:44 UTC
Can digikam detect and report about such problems? Right now figuring that out is quite problematic.
Comment 11 caulier.gilles 2017-07-25 19:38:30 UTC
This problem is relevant of digiKam KIO Slaves and all of these have been dropped in favor of a multi-threaded interface to query the database.