Version: 1.0.0-beta2 (rev.: 984662) (using 4.2.90 (KDE 4.2.90 (KDE 4.3 Beta2)) "release 138", KDE:KDE4:Factory:Desktop / openSUSE_Factory) Compiler: gcc OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.30-rc8-6-pae I fount that if you try to rotate an image in the icon view the image is rotated but the thumbnail is not updated.
Gilles, Marcel, already reported in the porting2ModelView.ods file... So I can confirm it. Andi
Andi, Marcel, Sound like releavant of thumbs DB... Note: others suggestion : I thinking to strap definitively JPEGLossLess kipi-plugin. We can reproduce easily this tool with digiKam core (JpegUtils + DImg). This will give a better integration in digiKam GUI. Your viewpoints ? Gilles Caulier
Gilles: There is some matrix multiplication code in JPEGlossless that combines the current EXIF flag with the wished behavior - you see the image exif-rotated in portrait mode and rotate by 90°, the actual rotation is either 0° or 180° and resetting the exif flag. This code must not be lost. Generally I would agree to putting this into BQM for ex.
Hmm it seems to work suddenly... can you confirm?
SVN commit 1032493 by aclemens: Seems to be fixed. BUG:197609 M +2 -1 NEWS M +34 -26 project/porting2ModelView.ods WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1032493
Short amendment to my comment #3: The matrix multiplication code is available from libkexiv2 now.
I seems this bug shows it's ugly face again. The thumbnail does rotate, but not the picture nor in slideview. Using the Gimp and open it, save it, then the picture is correct in all views. The same problem in Gwenview. Are they using the same library?
If you use JPEG file, yes, libjpeg is common library Gilles Caulier
Gilles is not libexiv important as well?
yes, Exiv2 is common to gwenview and digiKam, but Gwenview do not use libkexiv2. I will be interesting to see which file format is relevant of this problem... Gilles Caulier
hmm if I'm not wrong Tom (comment #7) experienced the opposite problem, e.g. thumbnail ok but the picture is not really rotated. I believe it's more like mandriva bug https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60275
On Monday, August 16, 2010 08:27:55 am Angelo Naselli wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197609 > > > > > > --- Comment #9 from Angelo Naselli <anaselli linux it> 2010-08-16 17:27:30 > --- Gilles is not libexiv important as well? Here is another report https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228483