Version: (using KDE 3.5.9) Installed from: Debian testing/unstable Packages http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503364 503364@bugs.debian.org From: yzhh <yezonghui@gmail.com> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: akregator: does not use icon theme icon when displaying unread item numbers on system tray icon Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:58:41 +0800 Package: akregator Version: 4:3.5.9-5 Severity: minor akregator have this nice feature of displaying number of unread items on the system tray icon. But when I uses an kde icon theme that uses a new icon for akregator, the new icon is shown only when there is no unread item. When unread items are there, akregator uses its old default icon to write the number on it. The correct behaviour should be displaying the number on the new icon provided by the icon theme in use. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (1100, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=zh_CN, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN (charmap=GB2312) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages akregator depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-6 core libraries and binaries for al ii libc6 2.7-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1 GCC support library ii libkdepim1a 4:3.5.9-5 KDE PIM library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.8b-5 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.3.2-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 akregator recommends no packages. akregator suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
This bug has only been reported for versions before 4.14, which have been unsupported for at least two years now. Can anyone tell if this bug still present? If noone confirms this bug for a Framework-based version of akregator (version 5.0 or later, as part of KDE Applications 15.08 or later), it gets closed in about three months.
Just as announced in my last comment, I close this bug. If you encounter it again in a recent version (at least 5.0 aka 15.08), please open a new one unless it already exists. Thank you for all your input.