Bug 188965 - JPEG+RAW joint renaming feature
Summary: JPEG+RAW joint renaming feature
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 126153
Alias: None
Product: gwenview
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Debian testing Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gwenview Bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-04-06 15:30 UTC by Ray Ambrosi
Modified: 2017-09-11 15:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ray Ambrosi 2009-04-06 15:30:24 UTC 
Version:            (using KDE 3.5.10)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Debian testing/unstable Packages




Gwenview does not to allow s the simultaneous batch renaming of JPEG and RAW.  Among Windows software, I have only found Windows programs Breezebrowser and Photo Mechanic that offer this very useful feature.

In Breezebrowser, the JPEG and RAW pictures are displayed as a single thumbnail and can be batch renamed.  I find this an extremely convenient feature.  I would find it astonishing if other photographers do NOT ask for this feature as well.

If GwenView or your plugin could offer this feature, I and hopefully many others, would find this invaluable and give up using Windows software for this task.

Thank you once again for all the time you spend devoted to open source software
Comment 1 Aurelien Gateau 2009-05-11 22:28:34 UTC 
I added this to my TODO list, but I guess if I go this way we will also need joint moving/copying/deleting. What do you think about this?
Comment 2 Manfred Mislik 2009-07-21 09:20:49 UTC 
Joint deleting is a bit problematic.

E.g. I often shoot raw+jpeg with the jpeg as a reference for raw converting or so that I delete once I'm happy with the conversion or processing of the raw file.

I reckon this also applies to digikam.
Comment 3 Nate Graham 2017-09-11 03:29:51 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 173665 ***
Comment 4 Nate Graham 2017-09-11 15:46:26 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126153 ***