Bug 187751 - raw developer gives strange colours when using camera profiles
Summary: raw developer gives strange colours when using camera profiles
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: ColorManagement-Profiles (show other bugs)
Version: 0.9.5
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-03-21 00:37 UTC by Paul Hunt
Modified: 2022-02-01 11:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 5.1.0
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Hunt 2009-03-21 00:37:26 UTC 
Version:            (using KDE 3.5.10)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs

I have colour profiles for my Pentax K10D.  One is "borrowed" from a past Bibble trial, the other is one I made from a colour target, developed in ufraw and profiled using lprof.

Using digikam (0.9.5 stable from Suse builds, Suse 11.0 KDE 3.5.10) I get weird colours from the raw developer tool when using my own profile.  The bibble profile works OK.  My own profile works correctly in ufraw and in rawtherapee.

I will provide a sample PEF with the two profiles on request.

Paul
Comment 1 Paul Hunt 2009-03-28 02:44:41 UTC 
It seems that no profiles are working correctly - I am getting colour artefacts eg patches of red where there should be dark shadow.

Is the dcraw colour matrix being used in addition to the colour profiles?  When this was allowed in ufraw, I recall that the combination did not work well.

Paul
Comment 2 Marcel Wiesweg 2009-08-20 23:23:27 UTC 
Can you provide me a testcase? It should be clearly visible what is right and what is wrong.
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2011-12-12 18:35:40 UTC 
Paul,

It still valid, with 2.x release ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2013-11-27 13:34:00 UTC 
Paul, 

This entry still valid using digiKam 3.5.0 ?
Do you  read Marcel comment #2 ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 5 caulier.gilles 2015-06-30 08:07:21 UTC 
New digiKam 4.11.0 is available :

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?
Comment 6 caulier.gilles 2016-07-15 12:13:00 UTC 
With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier