Bug 187310 - RDP and nx server for krfb
Summary: RDP and nx server for krfb
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: krfb
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alessandro Praduroux
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-03-16 14:56 UTC by karaluh
Modified: 2010-07-06 04:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description karaluh 2009-03-16 14:56:57 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.2.0)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

It should be possible to choose which protocol to use to configure desktop sharing. The differences between them are huge, and it does matter which one do you use.
Comment 1 schmirrwurst 2009-04-13 17:45:59 UTC
I'd also like freenx support in krfb, since it greatly improves the quality from the desktop sharing upon internet, and security two...

Vnc is very fine for LAN, but for helping people on WAN, it is not enough...
Comment 2 schmirrwurst 2009-04-13 17:46:26 UTC
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
Comment 3 petr.bug 2009-05-03 02:32:04 UTC
Does it have to configured? Theoretically it should be possible to enable all protocols. (I failed to find a description of krbf's internals. It might be necessary for krbf to do inetd-like stub for the other server so the server does not have to be always running if no client is going to use him.)
Comment 4 iberlynx 2010-07-06 04:04:51 UTC
Sharing desktop would be a great way to help friends get into free software, but vnc is totally unfit for this purpose because it only works ok inside a LAN and even then! FreeNX is definately the way to go, since the protocol is secure,  efficient and low bandwith - Fast!
Comment 5 iberlynx 2010-07-06 04:07:47 UTC
this will indeed become a pressing matter when people start using telepathy to share destkop! VNC over IM (thru NATs and low bandwith channels), I just don't see it becoming a great success, which is unfortunate.