Bug 184133 - Archiv-Function for Kmail (Mails Archiv and Browse from Archiv-CD)
Summary: Archiv-Function for Kmail (Mails Archiv and Browse from Archiv-CD)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 77744
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 1.10.3
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-12 12:34 UTC by Samuel Suther
Modified: 2010-02-06 01:36 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Samuel Suther 2009-02-12 12:34:31 UTC
Version:           1.10.3 (using 4.1.3 (KDE 4.1.3) "release 70.4", KDE:KDE4:STABLE:Desktop / openSUSE_11.0)
Compiler:          gcc
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.25.20-0.1-pae

I wish Kmail has an archive-function. Should work such way describe here:

1) Important mails can be marked as "no archiv",  or as "archiv, but no delete)
2) If the archive-Funktion start, the archiver save all mails older than xy - Days to a Backup-directory.
Mails marked as "no archiv" would not saved, and Mails marked as archiv, but not delete" would be archived, but still leave in the Mailfolder.
3) So if Backup works, there should be a step which delete all Mails are older than xy Days (setting in Point 2)
4) Best feature would be, if the archive - which is burn on cd - can be insert into existing Maildir (only readable) - such like a funktion in digikam >> Config >> Collections Settings

This would Kmail boost onto the top of all Mail-Applications... cause no other Mail-App has such a great archiv-tool

What you think about it?
Comment 1 Jaime Torres 2009-02-21 23:14:59 UTC
I think this is a good idea. It is more or less like the akregator archive, but also with the ability to save it to another place and read it from there.
Comment 2 Björn Ruberg 2010-02-06 01:36:08 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 77744 ***