Version: 0.9.4 (using 3.5.9 "release 49.1" , openSUSE 11.0) Compiler: Target: i586-suse-linux OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.25.18-0.2-pae I have taken pictures so that there are more than one pic taken in a single second in the camera's storage. When I download pictures, I rename the images using the Cameras's name (D70-) and then I add the date and time of creation to that string in the format yyyyMMdd-hhmmss so that a typical name of a image would be D70-20061114-195729.JPG. When importing images from the camera taken e.g. in second 4 the name of the image gets D70-2009xxxx-yyyyy4. When importing the next picture (also made in that second), Digicam stops the importing process (which is annoying with cameras that just support USB1.1 and you got 2GB of Data in the card and you return from lunch hoping the import is finished....) and complies that there is already an image with that name and requests a decision to overwrite or rename or whatever. My suggestions: best: Add a tenth (and if some crazy japanese guys go further than that a hundreth) second entry in the dialog to rename the images - I do not know what cameras do supply for accuracy of the creation date second best: just let Digicam add a dash with an additional number that is counted up by one for each pic taken in that second. This was Nikon's original software behaviour. So I got images ending D70-2009xxxx-yyyyy4, then D70-2009xxxx-yyyyy4-1, then D70-2009xxxx-yyyyy4-2 and so on and then D70-2009xxxx-yyyyy5 I hope the problem is described well enough. Please feel free to contact me! Thanks for your great work - I don't want to fail to mention! Jo
Can you attach few image taken in this condition to test here. 3 images can be enough. Gilles Caulier
SVN commit 914345 by mwiesweg: Avoid creating double auto-rename names when downloading images. Insert -1, -2 etc. for duplicate names. This only applies if the generated download names are found to be equal in one download procedure; if files are really found on disk, of course the dialog will still be shown. CCBUG: 179902 M +31 -1 cameraui.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=914345
Jo, -rc1 is just around the corner, please test this commit then. You will get your "Nikon" behavior.
Jo, digiKam 0.10.0-rc1 is out. Please test and report Gilles Caulier
Thanks for your speedy work. I did not expect that so I missed to come here again so soon. As this bug tracking system is new to me: where can I find the release Candidate? I'm using Opensuse11. Can I add an additional repository or where else do I find the software? Thenks a lot Jo
Google for it. You can get packages from the opensuse build service. They have their own version numbering, maybe 0.10.0-79 is rc1, I can't tell. It's not on all KDE4 repositories, some only have a 0.10.0-77. I am running opensuse 11.1 myself but obviously will compile digikam myself. Their is a good page on the repositories that give you KDE4 as well (if you are running OpenSuse 11.1 out of the box with the given KDE4.1.3 I recommend to upgrade to KDE4.2 anyway, for having more fun)
J, Are find suitable digiKam 0.10.0-RC1 package for Suse ? Gilles Caulier
Jo, 0.10.0 final is out and there really should be packages for opensuse in the build service as described.
Jo, digiKam 0.10.0 is out since few month now. Can you give us a fresh report please ? Gilles Caulier
I just tested that with 3 picture taken in more than 1 seconde. It work fine. Gilles Caulier
Hello Gilles, you are right. I now installed OpenSuse 11.1 with KDE4 and now I can use the new feature.... By the way: What happens once I use the newest version of digikam and then I use an older version (0.95..) in another computer, using the same digikam3.db? Is the fileformat downwards compatible? Thanks! Jo Gilles Caulier schrieb: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179902 > > > Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |FIXED > > > > > --- Comment #10 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2009-07-22 15:21:25 --- > I just tested that with 3 picture taken in more than 1 seconde. It work fine. > > Gilles Caulier > >
> By the way: What happens once I use the newest > version of digikam and then I use an older version (0.95..) in another > computer, using the same digikam3.db? Is the fileformat downwards > compatible? digikam 0.10 and 1.0 use the database file "digikam4.db". The file "digikam3.db" is upgraded on first use. 0.9 does not know about digikam4.db.