Bug 175421 - plasma 'install new widgets' command will not add superkaramba theme
Summary: plasma 'install new widgets' command will not add superkaramba theme
Status: RESOLVED UNMAINTAINED
Alias: None
Product: superkaramba
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Ubuntu Unspecified
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Plasma Bugs List
URL:
Keywords:
: 171597 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-17 19:10 UTC by doc.evans
Modified: 2018-09-04 15:53 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments
popfile theme file (278 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2008-11-18 04:00 UTC, doc.evans
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description doc.evans 2008-11-17 19:10:03 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.1.3)
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

When I try to add the "popcheck" superkaramba theme (the files for which are on my machine) using the "Install New Widgets" dialog, the widget never appears in the list of available widgets after I click "Finish". So I can't add it, even though the files are on the machine.
Comment 1 Aaron J. Seigo 2008-11-17 21:26:32 UTC
does it show up if you run kbuildsycoca4 from a konsole? do the popcheck files appear in ~/.kde/share/apps/plasma/plasmoids?
Comment 2 doc.evans 2008-11-18 01:12:09 UTC
> does it show up if you run kbuildsycoca4 from a konsole?

I don't know if you intend me to do this or something else:

[HN:~] kbuildsycoca4
kbuildsycoca4 running...
kbuildsycoca4(8454) kdemain: Reusing existing ksycoca
[HN:~]

After running that, I went to look at the widget list, and it was unchanged (i.e., no popcheck).

>do the popcheck files appear in ~/.kde/share/apps/plasma/plasmoids? 

There is a new directory called ~/.kde/share/apps/plasma/plasmoids/sk_popcheck, but the directory is empty.
 
Comment 3 Aaron J. Seigo 2008-11-18 01:51:23 UTC
ok, so the directory was empty which means it didn't install (in 4.2 we actually pop up a message box saying why =)

from the command line try:

plasmapkg -t superkaramba -i <path to the sk theme>

and see what it says. (hopefully the version of plasmapkg you have is capable of -t .. if it isn't, attach the sk theme file to this br)
Comment 4 doc.evans 2008-11-18 04:00:40 UTC
Created attachment 28655 [details]
popfile theme file
Comment 5 doc.evans 2008-11-18 04:01:13 UTC
This is what I get:

----

[HN:popcheck] plasmapkg -t superkaramba -i *theme
plasmapkg(9393) SkPackage::installPackage: archivePath= "/home/n7dr/programs/superkaramba/popcheck/popcheck.theme" packageRoot= "/home/n7dr/.kde/share/apps/plasma/plasmoids"
plasmapkg(9393) SkPackage::installPackage: Failed to copy archive= "/home/n7dr/programs/superkaramba/popcheck/popcheck.theme"  to path= "/home/n7dr/.kde/share/apps/plasma/plasmoids/sk_popcheck"
Installation of /home/n7dr/programs/superkaramba/popcheck/popcheck.theme failed.
[HN:popcheck]

----

maybe it wants a new-style skz file, not a theme file?

I'm not sure what goes into an skz, though. 

I'll attach the theme file anyway.
Comment 6 Aaron J. Seigo 2008-11-18 04:50:48 UTC
yes, it wants a new skz file. i'll reassign to the superkaramba product just to be safe, but i think this one is a candidate for closure.
Comment 7 doc.evans 2008-11-19 00:27:38 UTC
Then I think that the instructions should explicitly talk about skz files, not themes.

When one goes to install the widget, the filter says "SuperKaramba Theme Files", which seems unambiguously (to me, anyway) to mean a .theme file. There is no hint anywhere that it might mean something else.

I'll try to figure out how to build an skz file and then report back on whether that installs correctly.
Comment 8 doc.evans 2008-11-19 00:39:25 UTC
OK, apart from my comment about providing better instructions, everything seems to work: I created a popcheck.skz file, and it installs and seems to run perfectly.

Sorry to have bothered you (but it was a result of the instructions' using "theme" to mean "skz file", so I don't feel like it was a completely unreasonable bug report).
Comment 9 Dario Andres 2009-05-22 22:16:45 UTC
*** Bug 171597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Andrew Crouthamel 2018-09-04 15:53:44 UTC
Hello! Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this project has been unmaintained for many years so I am closing this bug.