Bug 174431 - Items not checked in sessions list
Summary: Items not checked in sessions list
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL
Alias: None
Product: kdm
Classification: Miscellaneous
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdm bugs tracker
URL:
Keywords:
: 219224 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-06 14:41 UTC by Jonathan Thomas
Modified: 2010-02-27 12:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jonathan Thomas 2008-11-06 14:41:19 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 4.1.2)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

When the session type is set as "default", the text label correctly notes that this was the previous choice, but the "default" radio button is not actually checked. Things still work as expected, although it could be a tad confusing and technically it's wrong.

Also, since only one item can be checked at a time I think a checkbox would be a better choice for the list rather than a radio button.
Comment 1 Oswald Buddenhagen 2008-11-29 12:05:50 UTC
the not-checking is intentional - it ensures that when you explicitly select the session type before entering the user name, the type is not overridden. that could be done with some internal logic as well, but that would not be visible to the outside. ok, this is somewhat nitpicky, but so is the report. :)

i think you got the use cases for checkbox vs. radio button the wrong way round ...
Comment 2 Jonathan Thomas 2009-01-10 21:36:32 UTC
Ok, good enough for me.
Comment 3 Oswald Buddenhagen 2010-02-21 12:04:15 UTC
fwiw, if one wanted to fix this: introduce a new variable forcedWm. once an item is explicitly selected, the implicit "(previous)" would go away and a "(forced)" would "follow" the currently checked item.

i'm still not convinced it is a good idea, though.
Comment 4 Oswald Buddenhagen 2010-02-21 12:04:24 UTC
*** Bug 219224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Toralf Förster 2010-02-27 12:10:39 UTC
Hhm, from a users stand point :
Where's the advantage of not knowing which session is started after pressing the ENTER button ?