(*** This bug was imported into bugs.kde.org ***) Package: kmail Version: 1.1.99 (KDE 2.0) Severity: grave Compiler: gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) OS: Linux 2.2.14 i686 (compiled sources) KMail has suddenly started sending mail beginning directly with the DATA command skipping completely the RCPT TO: part so the server logically returns an error
On Friday 8. December 2000 22:50 vadim wrote: > Package: kmail > Version: 1.1.99 (KDE 2.0) > Severity: grave > Compiler: gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) > OS: Linux 2.2.14 i686 (compiled sources) > > KMail has suddenly started sending mail beginning directly with the DATA > command skipping completely the RCPT TO: part so the server logically > returns an error Where do you know that from? Did that happen only once or does it happen always? If it happened only once maybe a network package get lost somewhere in the internet. Regards Michael Häckel
On Tuesday 12. December 2000 00:57 you wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2000 15:09 you wrote: > > Where do you know that from? > > Well I see the commands it's sending on the status window and I see the > error message from the server (my server) saying that the recipient is not > specified. > > I send the mail to my own SMTP server since I have some problems with the > teleline one. KMail seems unable to authenticate so it doesn't let me send > email to the people who aren't on teleline.es > > > Did that happen only once or does it happen always? If it happened only > > once maybe a network package get lost somewhere in the internet. > > Always but it's already fixed! I noticed that the bug email was sent > correctly so tired some things. It looks like there was a corrupt email in > the mailbox that was giving problems. It works now but I think that it > would be nice to detect those. I don't have time now but I will try to > find which one exactly it was and send a copy If there is a mail in the outbox that can not be sent KMail tries to send it the next time again. This problem is mentions in the documentation. I close the report then. Regards Michael Haeckel