Version: (using KDE KDE 3.5.7) Installed from: SuSE RPMs Application exclusion is not too user-friendly (not intuitive for sure). Please add listbox with list of applications, edit-box would serve as entry point, please add button [open] to select specific application (I would not bet what happen if I just type "abc").
Never tried the "What's this?" help? It's very handy, not only in this case.
Oh, and the small manual page of that module (reachable via click on the '?' button on the top-right corner) says that as well.
Pino, 0) there is big [help] button as well and it is much harder to miss :-) 1) need for using help is proof that GUI is not intuitive 2) even with "help" (I tried it) it is still not user friendly (is "abc" /usr/bin/abc or /usr/local/share/bin/abc ?) 3) with several apps it looks bad Thus the wish.
> 1) need for using help is proof that GUI is not intuitive The fact that the help system exists is there for a reason, otherwise the same thought can be applied on every software out there. > 2) even with "help" (I tried it) it is still not user friendly (is "abc" /usr/bin/abc or /usr/local/share/bin/abc ?) All the examples give "foo:bar", with no paths. > 3) with several apps it looks bad ... no comment here.
> > 1) need for using help is proof that GUI is not intuitive > The fact that the help system exists is there for a reason, otherwise the > same thought can be applied on every software out there. And it is -- I used help < 10 times in my life I think. In other words -- if I am forced to use it, I assume the UI is not intuitive. And in this case how can it be -- how can you guess how you should enter apps names? > > 2) even with "help" (I tried it) it is still not user friendly > (is "abc" /usr/bin/abc or /usr/local/share/bin/abc ?) > All the examples give "foo:bar", with no paths. Sure, and I still don't know which "foo" it is. But better let's stop here -- my wish is about app, not help.