Bug 143361 - Album Picture in Collection Manager, Problem when 2 Albums have the same name
Summary: Album Picture in Collection Manager, Problem when 2 Albums have the same name
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 170146
Alias: None
Product: amarok
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 1.4.5
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Amarok Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 152565 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-22 21:43 UTC by Martin Bürge
Modified: 2009-06-23 01:28 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Bürge 2007-03-22 21:43:17 UTC 
Version:           1.4.5 (using KDE KDE 3.5.6)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
Compiler:          GCC-4.1.2 
OS:                Linux

I have many Albums from different artists with the same name as an example:

Bryan Adams - Room Service
Roxette - Room Service

I've got more albums where the artists are different and the album names are the same, in this situation amarok can't save the Picture, or it can't display the picture in Collection Browser. In collection browser means the new feature from 1.4.5.

I hope you understand my English - Sorry
Comment 1 Kevin Funk 2007-11-19 21:11:54 UTC 
*** Bug 152565 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Jonas Vejlin 2009-04-04 12:39:11 UTC 
Do you still have this problem with amarok 2 ?
Comment 3 Martin Bürge 2009-04-04 13:51:31 UTC 
Yes i just installed Amarok 2.0.3.
The Problem still exists.

What i've done:
First i got the Cover for Roxette - Room Service, no problem, saved and works.
Then i downloaded a cover for Bryan Adams - Room Service, i could download it, but then it doesn't show the Bryan Adams Cover, it shows the Roxette Cover.

So the problem still exists.
Comment 4 Myriam Schweingruber 2009-04-05 01:03:20 UTC 
There is no Amarok 2.0.3.... you mean 2.0.2?
Comment 5 Dario Panico 2009-06-05 14:27:46 UTC 
bug still present in recent svn
Comment 6 Alexey Shildyakov 2009-06-23 01:28:49 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 170146 ***