Bug 127999 - X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
Summary: X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 123048
Alias: None
Product: kst
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 1.x
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR crash
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kst
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-25 08:16 UTC by eitan
Modified: 2006-05-28 07:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description eitan 2006-05-25 08:16:06 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.5.3)
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs
Compiler:          suse 10.1 
OS:                Linux

When plotting the application frezes completely, here is a partial of very long shell output:

 Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
  Major opcode:  153
  Minor opcode:  5
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
  Major opcode:  153
  Minor opcode:  6
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
  Major opcode:  153
  Minor opcode:  23
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
  Major opcode:  153
  Minor opcode:  23
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
  Major opcode:  153
  Minor opcode:  23
  Resource id:  0x3200cd0
Comment 1 Ted Kisner 2006-05-25 08:50:48 UTC
Hmmm, I wonder if this is related to bug 123048, which dealt with creating 
KstBackbBffers.  The problem was we had specified the bitdepth rather than 
letting Qt do the right thing.  Does anyone have any thoughts?  Did that 
bugfix (committed by George on 2006-03-04) make it into these Suse RPM's?

Would be interesting to know what version of Qt you are using, and what 
version of kst you are using.

The latest source tarball of version 1.2.1 should contain the fix for bug 
123048, so it would be interesting to know if this version has the same 
problem you experience with the Suse RPM's.

-Ted

On Wednesday 24 May 2006 23:16, eitan wrote:
| ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
| You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
|
| http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127999
|            Summary: X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter)
|                     179
|            Product: kst
|            Version: unspecified
|           Platform: SuSE RPMs
|         OS/Version: Linux
|             Status: UNCONFIRMED
|           Severity: crash
|           Priority: NOR
|          Component: general
|         AssignedTo: kst kde org
|         ReportedBy: eprv zahav net il
|
|
| Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.5.3)
| Installed from:    SuSE RPMs
| Compiler:          suse 10.1
| OS:                Linux
|
| When plotting the application frezes completely, here is a partial of very
| long shell output:
|
|  Minor opcode:  6
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
|   Major opcode:  153
|   Minor opcode:  5
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
|   Major opcode:  153
|   Minor opcode:  6
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
|   Major opcode:  153
|   Minor opcode:  23
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
|   Major opcode:  153
|   Minor opcode:  23
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| X Error: RenderBadPicture (invalid Picture parameter) 179
|   Major opcode:  153
|   Minor opcode:  23
|   Resource id:  0x3200cd0
| _______________________________________________
| Kst mailing list
| Kst@kde.org
| https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kst
Comment 2 eitan 2006-05-25 12:06:12 UTC
Thank you Ted
kst is 1.1.1 I tried to install a suse 10.1 rpm of the latest version
1.2.1 but the suse installer refused to install because of some
depedencies problem
is there a way around?
qt is qt3 ver 3.3.5-58
Comment 3 eitan 2006-05-25 12:08:53 UTC
Thank you Ted
kst is 1.1.1 I tried to install a suse 10.1 rpm of the latest version
1.2.1 but the suse installer refused to install because of some
depedencies problem
is there a way around?
qt is qt3 ver 3.3.5-58
Comment 4 George Staikos 2006-05-25 14:16:05 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 123048 ***
Comment 5 George Staikos 2006-05-25 14:17:36 UTC
Sorry, no workaround.  They changed Qt and it made our app crash.  You need to 
update Kst or downgrade KDE+Qt to Qt 3.4.x or lower.
Comment 6 Ted Kisner 2006-05-25 17:21:55 UTC
| kst is 1.1.1 I tried to install a suse 10.1 rpm of the latest version
| 1.2.1 but the suse installer refused to install because of some
| depedencies problem
| is there a way around?
| qt is qt3 ver 3.3.5-58

So you can't install the dependencies?  I guess you could try compiling from 
source (either the source rpm, or the tarball on the kst website).  Of 
course, typically building from source requires that you install a large 
number of KDE/Qt/etc development packages that you may not already have 
installed.

I don't know who maintains the Suse RPM's (Matt, do you do these, or only the 
Fedora ones?), but if there is a problem with the packaging then they would 
be the one to contact...

-Ted

 
Comment 7 Matthew Truch 2006-05-25 17:33:39 UTC
> I don't know who maintains the Suse RPM's (Matt, do you do these, or only the 
> Fedora ones?), but if there is a problem with the packaging then they would 
> be the one to contact...


I only maintain the Fedora RPMS.  I think there was a time when George
was making Suse RPMS, but I may be mistaken.  

What are the missing dependancies that the rpm complains about?
Comment 8 eitan 2006-05-25 22:28:34 UTC
Thank you all,
I will send the information to suse bug report
Comment 9 Ted Kisner 2006-05-25 23:02:22 UTC
On Thursday 25 May 2006 13:28, eitan wrote:
| Thank you all,
| I will send the information to suse bug report

Ok, but you never told us which dependencies are failing with this kst-1.2 rpm 
(where did you find this by the way?  I looked around a bit for it).  We 
might be able to provide the Suse packagers with more specific bug reports if 
we could look at the actual spec file and see what dependencies are being 
required.  

Also, if this is an "unofficial" package for 10.1, the Suse people probably 
have nothing to do with it.  Once again another reason that it would be good 
to look at the actual package you are trying to install.  

-Ted
Comment 10 eitan 2006-05-28 07:50:18 UTC
Hi Ted
Sorry, I had to finish some work so I switched to Fedora 5, kst 1.2.1 is 
running perfectly, it is an excellent program, better then grace and others.
However I can not trace back the information now, but it was an 
unofficial package
Thank you for your concern