Version: 1.5.0.2.2 (using KDE KDE 3.5.1) Installed from: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux When I generate code out of the 1.5.0.2.2 umbrello graph, the comments for auto-generated methods (getter/setter) is correct using @param etc. but these comments do not appear for my own operations and their parameters. I have tested it for java and c++ is this a bug, or a feature?
Edit: It seems that umbrello does export rdoc comments, when there is no other comment defined for an operation. I think it would be better to have both kinds of comments.
This bug its present at 1.5.2 version too. The comments of the parameters entered by the user are ignored by the code generator. I have tried with C++ and Doxygen not rdoc.
I am a bit lost with this bug. According to me, this doesn't still exist in 1.5.7. The comments entered by the user are written by the code generator in Java, C++ and Ruby.
> The comments entered by the user are written by the code generator in Java, > C++ and Ruby. It may be that the original poster was using the Advanced Code Generators which have been disabled due to stability problems. Also he mentions getter/setter methods autogenerated for attributes. It may well be that no doc is generated on those - I haven't checked. At any rate, IMHO the doc at the attribute itself should suffice, and should not be replicated at the accessor methods.
> but these comments do not appear for my own operations and their parameters. in 2.15.1 generated c++ code includes comments for operations but not for parameters
Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved.