Bug 106551 - no bug but enhancement for delete items in calender
Summary: no bug but enhancement for delete items in calender
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: korganizer
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-31 13:34 UTC by Hubertus Giese
Modified: 2009-05-14 22:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hubertus Giese 2005-05-31 13:34:03 UTC
Version:           3.4 (using KDE 3.4.0%20Level%20%22b%22%20,%20SUSE%209.3)
Compiler:          gcc%20version%203.3.5%2020050117%20(prerelease)%20(SUSE%20Linux)
OS:                Linux%20(i686)%20release%202.6.11.4-20a-default

I miss the feature "delete this event and all earlier" for repeated events. 
For examble: 
I establish an event "birthday" for the date 4. May 1967. Now I want to delete all the dates fom 1967 till now.
Comment 1 Reinhold Kainhofer 2005-05-31 13:55:49 UTC
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 13:34, Hubertus Giese wrote:
> I miss the feature "delete this event and all earlier" for repeated events.
> For examble:
> I establish an event "birthday" for the date 4. May 1967. Now I want to
> delete all the dates fom 1967 till now.


So that the birthday event starts on 4. May 2005? Why would you want to do 
this?
Just because the event happens yearly (and so there are 38 events up to now), 
doesn't mean each of these occurences takes up extra memory.

Reinhold
Comment 2 Reinhold Kainhofer 2006-11-02 18:51:04 UTC
Reassigning all KOrganizer bug reports and wishes to the newly created 
korganizer-devel mailing list.
Comment 3 Sergio Martins 2009-03-06 06:00:27 UTC
It doesn't occupy extra memory nor extra disk space.

If you really want this you can "Dissociate Future Occurrences" and then delete  the first one.
Comment 4 Sergio Martins 2009-05-14 22:53:47 UTC
It's a false problem, as indicated by comment #1, no feedback from user and it's already possible through dissociation.

Closing.