Bug 97390

Summary: option to hide folders without new/unread mails
Product: [Unmaintained] kmail Reporter: Unknown <null>
Component: folder listAssignee: kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: wishlist CC: bjoern, jjm, karl, mail, tore
Priority: NOR    
Version: 1.7.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Debian testing   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Unknown 2005-01-18 22:41:48 UTC
Version:           1.7.1 (using KDE KDE 3.3.90)
Installed from:    Debian testing/unstable Packages
OS:                Linux

the tree of mailfolders is growing and it is not possible anymore to have a fast overview over unread/new messages. It would be nice to be able to hide all folders without new/unread mails more or less similar to "hide offline users" in instant messangers.
Comment 1 Unknown 2006-01-13 19:55:44 UTC
I would implement this myself, because I really would like to have this. But I need some pointers where to look in the code (it's hell a lot!) and as this is the first time of KDE/qt programming: some quick howto's wouldn't hurt.
Comment 2 Bram Schoenmakers 2006-01-26 18:14:21 UTC
http://developer.kde.org/documentation is your friend then. Also, there's a KMail dedicated list for posting eventual questions. Good luck!
Comment 3 Unknown 2006-09-21 13:08:19 UTC
I put this into the queue long enough, but now I started with some work. 
The idea is to create a search bar similar to the one for the message list.

My question would be, does it makes sense to integrate this in current kmail (1.9.4) or is it better to use something for KDE4 (or lets say wait another couple of weeks until there is a usable beta)

BTW, thanks for the luck
Comment 4 Ingo Klöcker 2006-09-22 23:02:52 UTC
KMail 1.9.x is a dead horse. So you'd better concentrate on KDE 4 although it's more like a couple of quarter than a couple of weeks until there will be anything which could be called "not too unstable".
Comment 5 Thomas McGuire 2007-05-07 17:31:04 UTC
*** Bug 145135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-20 18:51:52 UTC
Hmm... believe there is a duplicate of this somewhere, but cannot find it.
Comment 7 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-25 00:25:42 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 80516 ***