Bug 97390

Summary:	option to hide folders without new/unread mails
Product:	[Applications] kmail	Reporter:	Unknown <null>
Component:	folder list	Assignee:	kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	wishlist	CC:	bjoern, jjm, karl, mail, tore
Priority:	NOR
Version:	1.7.1
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Debian testing
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:

Description Unknown 2005-01-18 22:41:48 UTC

Version:           1.7.1 (using KDE KDE 3.3.90)
Installed from:    Debian testing/unstable Packages
OS:                Linux

the tree of mailfolders is growing and it is not possible anymore to have a fast overview over unread/new messages. It would be nice to be able to hide all folders without new/unread mails more or less similar to "hide offline users" in instant messangers.

Comment 1 Unknown 2006-01-13 19:55:44 UTC

I would implement this myself, because I really would like to have this. But I need some pointers where to look in the code (it's hell a lot!) and as this is the first time of KDE/qt programming: some quick howto's wouldn't hurt.

Comment 2 Bram Schoenmakers 2006-01-26 18:14:21 UTC

http://developer.kde.org/documentation is your friend then. Also, there's a KMail dedicated list for posting eventual questions. Good luck!

Comment 3 Unknown 2006-09-21 13:08:19 UTC

I put this into the queue long enough, but now I started with some work. 
The idea is to create a search bar similar to the one for the message list.

My question would be, does it makes sense to integrate this in current kmail (1.9.4) or is it better to use something for KDE4 (or lets say wait another couple of weeks until there is a usable beta)

BTW, thanks for the luck

Comment 4 Ingo Klöcker 2006-09-22 23:02:52 UTC

KMail 1.9.x is a dead horse. So you'd better concentrate on KDE 4 although it's more like a couple of quarter than a couple of weeks until there will be anything which could be called "not too unstable".

Comment 5 Thomas McGuire 2007-05-07 17:31:04 UTC

*** Bug 145135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-20 18:51:52 UTC

Hmm... believe there is a duplicate of this somewhere, but cannot find it.

Comment 7 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-25 00:25:42 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 80516 ***