Summary: | mark email addresses outdated in address book | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kaddressbook | Reporter: | BORGULYA Gabor <bvg.kdebug> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | luigi.toscano, pancho.s, tokoe |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
BORGULYA Gabor
2003-12-15 02:04:39 UTC
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** And how about removing the address from the address book instead instead of keeping it? No because the mails with old address still exist in maildatabase, having the address still in the addressbook keeps the address connected with picture, Im-status etc. and also would allow it to correct it if you reply to it. Would also help if someone has multiple address and you only want to use one for answering. In that case you could check [x]do not use for answer in the addressbook and the standardemailaddress would be used instead. Thank you for your feature request. Kmail1 is currently unmaintained so we are closing all wishes. Please feel free to reopen a feature request for Kmail2 if it has not already been implemented. Thank you for your understanding. Instead of creating a new feature request, please confirm here if the wishlist is still valid for kmail2. Still applies to kmail2, but actually more to kaddressbook. Okey, let kdepim developers decide, if this is for kadressbook or kmail2 (which indeed no longer has an "addressbook" component in the bug tracker). *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved. |